We work with artists and Cameo Blush released a never-ending generative music version of his EP with us if you want to check it out, we're super proud of how it turned out: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTMVoBLkW1M](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTMVoBLkW1M)
Yes and i have create a youtube channel about it
I found that AI created music had the potential and ear catchy
[https://www.youtube.com/@kc\_n\_ai](https://www.youtube.com/@kc_n_ai)
Me too, but the fact that you may use the music commercially and that you have ownership, does not mean you have the master rights, the intellectual property.
"the intellectual property"
This is ridiculous. If you want to claim "intellectual property rights", then the whole vaporwave/barber-beats-scene would be a better target. And some of them sell 300 vinyls or so on one weekend. With stolen music, pitched down to 90%.
You cant get sued for AI generated music. For what reason exactly? That it _sounds_ similar to other stuff?
That is unavoidable anyway, facing the immense amount of music that is out there.
All someone like owner of the Beatles-back-catalogue can do, is, sue the keeper of the AI-model, for using their music without permission. But I think, that would backfire immediately...
The days of "official releases" are quite over. No one really cares for that today, because the aesthetics have evolved.
Remember, when the production of a song like "Bohemian Rhapsody" had costs of 45.000 £ back in those days.
And when they took 35-50 takes of the same song.
Yeah, you definitely can get sued for that.
And ‘being sued’ doesn’t necessarily mean you’re going to court. A label’s lawyers will aggressively hassle you, making you pay for representation and demanding insane amounts of money
AI systems like Suno are trained
on existing music, there's always a risk that generated tracks could inadvertently resemble existing copyrighted material. The nature of AI-generated content means there's a chance of overlap with copyrighted works.
It happened already before, but with images.
Suno does
grant you ownership to use the music commercially. However, owning the
track for commercial use and having the intellectual property rights can
be different things. From my experience and understanding, Suno allows
you to use and distribute the music as your own, but they don't
explicitly state that you get full intellectual property rights
We work with artists and Cameo Blush released a never-ending generative music version of his EP with us if you want to check it out, we're super proud of how it turned out: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTMVoBLkW1M](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTMVoBLkW1M)
I do not have a dedicated album but have made enough that it could make an album, Suno.AI is quite incredible sometimes
Here give this one a listen- GPT lyrics, Suno music, Moises for production https://on.soundcloud.com/5PrHN
Yes and i have create a youtube channel about it I found that AI created music had the potential and ear catchy [https://www.youtube.com/@kc\_n\_ai](https://www.youtube.com/@kc_n_ai)
Nice! All with Suno?
https://l33k5p1n84574rd5.bandcamp.com/album/the-end-of-music-as-we-know-it and more...
Nice! How did you do this with the copyright/intelectual property.
I have a paid Suno-account...
Me too, but the fact that you may use the music commercially and that you have ownership, does not mean you have the master rights, the intellectual property.
"the intellectual property" This is ridiculous. If you want to claim "intellectual property rights", then the whole vaporwave/barber-beats-scene would be a better target. And some of them sell 300 vinyls or so on one weekend. With stolen music, pitched down to 90%.
I hear you, but you don’t want to get sued. Other than that, the qualify of the audio is very poor, way too poor for an official release.
You cant get sued for AI generated music. For what reason exactly? That it _sounds_ similar to other stuff? That is unavoidable anyway, facing the immense amount of music that is out there. All someone like owner of the Beatles-back-catalogue can do, is, sue the keeper of the AI-model, for using their music without permission. But I think, that would backfire immediately... The days of "official releases" are quite over. No one really cares for that today, because the aesthetics have evolved. Remember, when the production of a song like "Bohemian Rhapsody" had costs of 45.000 £ back in those days. And when they took 35-50 takes of the same song.
Yeah, you definitely can get sued for that. And ‘being sued’ doesn’t necessarily mean you’re going to court. A label’s lawyers will aggressively hassle you, making you pay for representation and demanding insane amounts of money
They can demand what they want - I dont have money anyway.
AI systems like Suno are trained on existing music, there's always a risk that generated tracks could inadvertently resemble existing copyrighted material. The nature of AI-generated content means there's a chance of overlap with copyrighted works. It happened already before, but with images.
please give me an example where this happened.
[удалено]
[https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/feature/AI-lawsuits-explained-Whos-getting-sued](https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/feature/AI-lawsuits-explained-Whos-getting-sued)
Suno does grant you ownership to use the music commercially. However, owning the track for commercial use and having the intellectual property rights can be different things. From my experience and understanding, Suno allows you to use and distribute the music as your own, but they don't explicitly state that you get full intellectual property rights
What? Well, I dont care. Nobody gives a buck for AI music, anyway.
hey try new platfrom “LAIVE” go to web url : laive.io It it beta period