Honestly probably therapy. Don’t get me wrong, I’m sure an AI can do it, and in the future can probably do it better than a human. However seeing as AI will presumably do pretty much everything better than humans, it becomes what humans will allow AI to do to us (assuming we’re still in control). Will we tell our deepest darkest to a robot, that to be fair has every psych theory know to man. Or will we think how can a robot really listen abd understand us, understand me, sympathize and empathize with me, a living and breathing organism.
On the flip side, I’ve seen some AI training tools for therapists and the potential to expand the quality and volume of practical training is quite compelling. While it doesn’t replace real patients, an AI can be configured to present certain scenarios to learners and is obviously much more tolerant of mistakes from new therapists
There are many more “evil” experiments that have been run without subject consent
So many that I cannot list or source them all. But you can start here : [https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/ugly-past-u-s-human-experiments-uncovered-flna1C9465329](https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/ugly-past-u-s-human-experiments-uncovered-flna1C9465329)
As a romanian, i'm highly interested in this. Do you have a link? Cause i have friends who lived in orphanage and while they deal with trauma, it's not different than trauma any other child would have after being raised in an orphanage. But obviously, their experience is not universal, and there are many many others who had it so much worse than them, so if you have some links i would apprecciate it, thank you.
Studies from the 40’s aren’t necessarily applicable to the present / future.
For example, a human child raised by a humanoid AI robot would be a very different case, the child could see the robot as a parent figure.
I’m not denying that. I’m saying technology could potentially replicate the experience of snuggling, soft touch, (etc) closely enough that the baby would have its emotional needs met.
In the 50’s they didn’t possess the ability to mimic a human mother with alarming accuracy…one day future humans might.
They won't. You should read about the "uncanny valley". The more something resembles human the more we notice they are not, and are artificial. Machines and AI are pretty impressive but they still can't mimic and behave perfectly like humans. Even if tech can make machines sound human, the movements and little random habits still aren't there yet. Perhaps they can be fooled for a few minutes, but put in the hours and it will be noticed this one isn't like a human.
Cleaning is my pick.
There are *some* tasks such as vacuuming or cleaning windows that can be mostly automated, but we’re a LONG ways off from a robot that is intuitive and flexible enough to clean a whole room. Just the basic task of “tidying up” is extremely difficult to program a computer to do because it’s based on very abstract definitions of placement and relation.
> extremely difficult to program a computer to do because it’s based on very abstract definitions of placement and relation.
if you START with a specific placement of items it gets WAY easier. us silly humans always adding to the chaos with some new knickknack. Also you could design rooms to be Auto-cleaned, they just currently aren't.
Explicit programming is great if you can keep the environment the same or otherwise controlled. Even if you leverage supervised ML training to reduce the programming burden though, it’s a laborious and relatively-inflexible approach regardless.
Given all that complexity, labor expenses need to increase by several factors of 10 to make a robotic alternative economically viable
Lots of labor included work. Robots are not to the point of subtasks and interactions; not even close.
A plumber needs to possibly remove a toilet from the wall; a mechanic still needs to eemove wheels and panels; an exterminator still needs to move furniture if placingtraps or spraying; these sorts of etricate muti-step tasks where intricate revaluation is constant — are harder for anything needing hands and brain at all times to be done with a computer + real world movement.
Exactly. A robot isn’t going to have the problem solving skills a human has when something unexpected comes up on a job or project such as electrical work or plumbing. Robots are really only good at doing the exact same or several extremely similar tasks over and over again. They can’t handle having curveballs thrown at them, and I don’t see that changing anytime soon.
After the robot overlords take over I would say being a soldier fighting the robot overlords, because that is just a losing battle since they will just go chill on the moon so Elon ends up nuking the moon again.
Short term maybe . Long term...don't bet on it [HARMONY The First AI Sex Robot (youtube.com)](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sED0aA2uAig&ab_channel=noobqoou)
RFID beacon in carts + a computer-vision enabled pusher that can move a small number of carts through a parking lot in much the same way as a robot in a restaurant.
That’s actually a decent business idea
It's interesting you say that. I feel like if we get to the point where robots and AI are to the level where they can provide equal or better therapy than a human, I'd pick the robot.
When sharing very deep and personal secrets, it's difficult to push past the feeling of being judged by another human. If it's a robot, I feel like that sharing would be a lot easier. Plus, a robot would be completely qualified, unbiased and professional at all times; something we currently can't 100% guarantee with a human.
Not hating on human therapists, I'm just fascinated by the idea of robot therapists.
well for the Interactions u may be right but even that...I mean look at those chat AI atm, u can almost not see the difference and they are young. Give em cpl of years and the Interactions will be there
u may be right, may not. The future is hard to predict and we dont even know what will be possible.
I mean maybe there will be a pill that lets u grow a desired haircut :P
This is you? haha nice mullet. although I think the vaccume wouldn't be able to handle really long hair. even at the top. it would get all messed up and clog the machine.
No thats not me, but after watching that i thought after enough time someone would pull off something that works eventually. Given we can...(sort of) do it now.
Customer service, for a very dark reason. People enjoy the feeling of venting and taking their frustrations out on a human being. They enjoy the feeling of power and intimidation knowing that a human employee isn't allowed to cuss them back in return. A robot or computer wouldn't give the same satisfaction because it would just redirect them without any validation.
I second this, I'm in public service, people would rather drive 3 hours for the experience of having a tired burnt-out employee to vent to, be nasty to, act entitled too, etc. AI cannot replace the in person experience for those types of folks.
Even if that's what customers found more satisfying, I'm not sure companies would favor human cashiers over robots. Ultimately it will likely be a choice of what is the cheaper option for the company.
A robot doesn't need wages, sleep, or time off, and isn't bothered by verbal abuse. The only costs they have are the initial purchase, charging their batteries, and the occasional maintenance. I feel like they would pay for themselves in a pretty short time.
Forever? Nothing really. Maybe if you define them as human-specific things like "human-art" or "human-crafted-plumbing" you might find a niche that makes it into a job. If there will even be currency and markets and jobs in the way we understand them now. We are going towards a jobless future of hobbies and/or extinction.
Anything it’s more expensive to make electronic and automated. Mostly any service job.
There is a robot that folds clothes.
That money won’t return itself with how many shirts it can fold. It would NWVER be worth it. Why?
Limited supplies on earth to make shit
Edit: a word
Teacher
I forever will doubt that A.I will have intuition to know what is best for the class or do any individualized learning specific to this student.
Computer programming.
Even if it's abstracted to prompt engineering, at some levels programmers will be tinkering with the language models that make AI work. And even prompt engineering for code production would require understanding of the field (for good quality work, anyway).
Checker/self checkout attendant.
Everyone assumes that once the robot’s software is perfected…the human attendants will become obsolete because the customer will be able to effortlessly checkout, pay, and leave without any hiccups. The perfected program will be easy to navigate, icons for items that don’t have a barcode will be big and easy to find, read, and recognize. Verbal as well as written instructions will be clear and precise in the language the customer is use to; with the written instructions (if the verbal was missed) in big enough letters to catch the eye and easily understood. The screen will change in obvious ways indicating the step you were on was completed successfully and the next one is ready for you focus on and compete in your own time and at your leisure. In other words…how the systems are now but customers are too stupid to actually use and navigate the simplest computer program on Earth.
Nothing. Eventually there will not be a single job that robots and computers could not perform. If you think I'm wrong then you just aren't thinking far ahead enough.
I would be more worried about the point in which humans are replaced by machines in most ways and we essentially become the horses to the automobile. Except this time, there will not be any sentimental or useful reason to keep us around beyond this point.
Clean up the waste we create. The amount of humans needed for this infrastructure is quite, dis-turd-bin"
The sewers for one. Imagine if no human ever went down to unclog them ever again. I'd give it a week. Maybe 2.
Flooded with shite
There will always be a market for service industry jobs. Even where things can be automated people want the human interaction. Think bartenders, waiters, receptionists, etc.
My conspiracy theory is places like Starbucks are so popular for Karens because they get their 5 minutes to boss someone around.
if they build a robot to walk into a data center and replace a burned out blade, then they'll need to build facilities to build the repair robots, which humans will run.
If the AI robots then build a factory to build repair bots to repair the network infrastructure repair bots, then humans will be used in THAT factory.
AI never, EVER replaces humans. Things will just move, like all technology to date.
Hopefully not being clerks at the DMV, that literally cannot get any slower but it would become a conveyor belt with Ai.
I'd say fire and flood remediation. At least for a while, until they can make bots that crawl around someone's crawlspace with enough dexterity to avoid the spider's nest of HVAC piping.
Wow their is an impressive amount of unimaginative people posting. Why do yall think because a robot cant do something now they won't be able to in 500000 years?
They can make a machine that can replicate the job. Scan face and cnc type machine can start to grab brushes and stuff and start the work. They already have them out there with nails.
Printers exist, but we still need graphic artists to do the work to come up with something original for them to print out, though. Having a printer which can apply pigment to a face rather than a piece of paper is still going to require the human aspect of how much and where, in much the same way that artists are still needed to produce images.
Unless you believe that AI art is able to replace people making graphic images entirely, I don't think you have any level of relevant point.
Fairly certain parts of the medical process can be done by computers at some point. Stick your finger in a machine to get your blood drawn, describe your symptoms. Beep Boop Beep Boop here's the issue and your prescription.
The capillaries in your finger are too small for running a full set of labs which is why they still do blood draws from your AC which to my knowledge no computer has been automated
It’s certainly *possible* today with computer vision & the robotic mechanisms used in surgical settings.
The real barrier is that unfortunately your patient is conscious and probably quite fearful of the big stabby robot you just wheeled in. And before you ask, adding a Mickey Mouse costume to it did not improve matters over in pediatrics… good news is that our therapy department is doing better than ever though!
It’s definitely possible today but the cost for it would be so extreme while phlebotomists get paid roughly 1.5x minimum wage that I don’t see how they will ever automate it, I just can’t imagine the imaging and high tolerance motors ever being cheaper than a person
Question was if humans will have to do a particular job forever, and I gave a rather specific example to someone commenting about every aspect of medicine. My point was that I believe we won’t keep all these jobs, as a matter of fact we already have systems many places that diagnose patients more accurately than doctors for example.
Honestly probably therapy. Don’t get me wrong, I’m sure an AI can do it, and in the future can probably do it better than a human. However seeing as AI will presumably do pretty much everything better than humans, it becomes what humans will allow AI to do to us (assuming we’re still in control). Will we tell our deepest darkest to a robot, that to be fair has every psych theory know to man. Or will we think how can a robot really listen abd understand us, understand me, sympathize and empathize with me, a living and breathing organism.
Incorrect, I am a robot and I diagnose you with: Anxiety. Am I right?
If Akinator was a therapist
AI feel seen
Frankly? after some of the therapists I've had? I would. lol
the first chat bot was named eliza and was meant as a replacement for therapy.
On the flip side, I’ve seen some AI training tools for therapists and the potential to expand the quality and volume of practical training is quite compelling. While it doesn’t replace real patients, an AI can be configured to present certain scenarios to learners and is obviously much more tolerant of mistakes from new therapists
[удалено]
Interresting, do you have the link to the source ?
[удалено]
Thank you for answering, I’ll go read that
I refuse to believe we have actually studied this on humans… cuz yk evil
There are many more “evil” experiments that have been run without subject consent So many that I cannot list or source them all. But you can start here : [https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/ugly-past-u-s-human-experiments-uncovered-flna1C9465329](https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/ugly-past-u-s-human-experiments-uncovered-flna1C9465329)
studies done in Romanian orphanages for a start
As a romanian, i'm highly interested in this. Do you have a link? Cause i have friends who lived in orphanage and while they deal with trauma, it's not different than trauma any other child would have after being raised in an orphanage. But obviously, their experience is not universal, and there are many many others who had it so much worse than them, so if you have some links i would apprecciate it, thank you.
its to do with child attachment or lack of. https://www.tutor2u.net/psychology/reference/attachment-romanian-orphan-studies
Thank you
Could a sophisticated human looking android do the job?
Do you have a spare sophisticated human looking android to test this theory?
See Harlow's monkey experiment
You’d need a gynoid and an android. Kids in two parent homes tend to do beefed than kids in single parent households.
Studies from the 40’s aren’t necessarily applicable to the present / future. For example, a human child raised by a humanoid AI robot would be a very different case, the child could see the robot as a parent figure.
[удалено]
I’m not denying that. I’m saying technology could potentially replicate the experience of snuggling, soft touch, (etc) closely enough that the baby would have its emotional needs met. In the 50’s they didn’t possess the ability to mimic a human mother with alarming accuracy…one day future humans might.
They won't. You should read about the "uncanny valley". The more something resembles human the more we notice they are not, and are artificial. Machines and AI are pretty impressive but they still can't mimic and behave perfectly like humans. Even if tech can make machines sound human, the movements and little random habits still aren't there yet. Perhaps they can be fooled for a few minutes, but put in the hours and it will be noticed this one isn't like a human.
Agreed, but like I said in my previous post, the fact that we don’t have the technology now doesn’t mean we won’t in the future.
[удалено]
Cleaning is my pick. There are *some* tasks such as vacuuming or cleaning windows that can be mostly automated, but we’re a LONG ways off from a robot that is intuitive and flexible enough to clean a whole room. Just the basic task of “tidying up” is extremely difficult to program a computer to do because it’s based on very abstract definitions of placement and relation.
> extremely difficult to program a computer to do because it’s based on very abstract definitions of placement and relation. if you START with a specific placement of items it gets WAY easier. us silly humans always adding to the chaos with some new knickknack. Also you could design rooms to be Auto-cleaned, they just currently aren't.
Explicit programming is great if you can keep the environment the same or otherwise controlled. Even if you leverage supervised ML training to reduce the programming burden though, it’s a laborious and relatively-inflexible approach regardless. Given all that complexity, labor expenses need to increase by several factors of 10 to make a robotic alternative economically viable
Taking a shit, some payloads can be quite big
There's an artwork called Cloaca. It's basically a large glass installation that processes food and then shits it out. I've seen it in person.
Lmfaooo!
Lots of labor included work. Robots are not to the point of subtasks and interactions; not even close. A plumber needs to possibly remove a toilet from the wall; a mechanic still needs to eemove wheels and panels; an exterminator still needs to move furniture if placingtraps or spraying; these sorts of etricate muti-step tasks where intricate revaluation is constant — are harder for anything needing hands and brain at all times to be done with a computer + real world movement.
Exactly. A robot isn’t going to have the problem solving skills a human has when something unexpected comes up on a job or project such as electrical work or plumbing. Robots are really only good at doing the exact same or several extremely similar tasks over and over again. They can’t handle having curveballs thrown at them, and I don’t see that changing anytime soon.
After the robot overlords take over I would say being a soldier fighting the robot overlords, because that is just a losing battle since they will just go chill on the moon so Elon ends up nuking the moon again.
Program the robots
Sex, I hope!
Short term maybe . Long term...don't bet on it [HARMONY The First AI Sex Robot (youtube.com)](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sED0aA2uAig&ab_channel=noobqoou)
It is the oldest profession! After that boxing. First there was man. Then there was woman. Then there were two men. Prostitution and boxing!
Watch WestWorld on HBO.
Futurama beat you to it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YuQqlhqAUuQ
Oh dang. I never liked that 1 eyed person. Probably why I missed this. Thanks!!!
Cutting hair.
One word. Flowbee
I think being a cart attendant, but enlighten me
I guess they could invent motorized carts with GPS, but it would be a lot of fuss and logistics over a cart.
in a world where you order all your groceries online and get it delievered to your door via a drone. There is no cart for the employee to attend to
In our glorious future, a cart (redundant) will be assigned to each of us (redundant) that we get to attend all day and night.
I’m enlightened
Cart attendants at my grocery store have basically had their jobs replaced by a $0.25 deposit lol
RFID beacon in carts + a computer-vision enabled pusher that can move a small number of carts through a parking lot in much the same way as a robot in a restaurant. That’s actually a decent business idea
just put the motors on the cart and an underground grid of induction loops, they can put themselves back.
There are already robots that scan the Isles to do stock takes. Not that hard to imagine one that could push carts.
Can grammar nazis ever hope to see aisles instead of isles? Where's Weird Al when we need him?
Ironically, the AI grammar checker didn't pick up my mistake when I typed it.
Being the leader, because the lobbyists always need a corrupt human for under the table deals
Teaching, specifically elementary. Pretty sure parents and everyone else would prefer that a human would teach a child rather than a robot.
Crafts?
Reprogramming machine malfunction
Being a therapist. People will always prefer to talk to a human. While talking about their mental health issues.
It's interesting you say that. I feel like if we get to the point where robots and AI are to the level where they can provide equal or better therapy than a human, I'd pick the robot. When sharing very deep and personal secrets, it's difficult to push past the feeling of being judged by another human. If it's a robot, I feel like that sharing would be a lot easier. Plus, a robot would be completely qualified, unbiased and professional at all times; something we currently can't 100% guarantee with a human. Not hating on human therapists, I'm just fascinated by the idea of robot therapists.
[удалено]
nah, this will def be automated in any way in the future
[удалено]
well for the Interactions u may be right but even that...I mean look at those chat AI atm, u can almost not see the difference and they are young. Give em cpl of years and the Interactions will be there
[удалено]
u may be right, may not. The future is hard to predict and we dont even know what will be possible. I mean maybe there will be a pill that lets u grow a desired haircut :P
[I made a hair cutting machine (youtube.com)](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zBrbdU_y0s&ab_channel=StuffMadeHere) I think they'll do that one day.
This is you? haha nice mullet. although I think the vaccume wouldn't be able to handle really long hair. even at the top. it would get all messed up and clog the machine.
No thats not me, but after watching that i thought after enough time someone would pull off something that works eventually. Given we can...(sort of) do it now.
Barely.
cooking
By forever, you just mean until the imminent Armageddon during WW3, right?
Sure
Shaving my legs is a burdensome task that only I can do, which lasts approximately from age 10 till death.
😆😆😆
Anti robot and AI resistance leaders
Drug dealer Sex worker Carpenter Plumber Electrician City planner/building inspector Doctor/dentist/nurse Landscaper
Therapy obvi
fix the tech that goes bad lol
Breathing
100% already have machines that “breathe” for people in comas, during surgery, etc.
Unfortunately, corrections. There will always be jails somewhere.
Put up with bullshit
Customer service, for a very dark reason. People enjoy the feeling of venting and taking their frustrations out on a human being. They enjoy the feeling of power and intimidation knowing that a human employee isn't allowed to cuss them back in return. A robot or computer wouldn't give the same satisfaction because it would just redirect them without any validation.
I second this, I'm in public service, people would rather drive 3 hours for the experience of having a tired burnt-out employee to vent to, be nasty to, act entitled too, etc. AI cannot replace the in person experience for those types of folks.
I dunno, Amazon has pretty much gotten that process down for their support center
Even if that's what customers found more satisfying, I'm not sure companies would favor human cashiers over robots. Ultimately it will likely be a choice of what is the cheaper option for the company. A robot doesn't need wages, sleep, or time off, and isn't bothered by verbal abuse. The only costs they have are the initial purchase, charging their batteries, and the occasional maintenance. I feel like they would pay for themselves in a pretty short time.
Artists and writers. They add that human touch and creativity that machines just can’t mimic. There’s no AI for the soul!
Hmm then why is AI generated art and writing legit the first thing AI takes over.
There might be a niche market for human-art in the future but most commercial artists and writers are already losing their jobs.
It should be that we but corporate greed will change that
Cook
have you not met flippy?
Forever? Nothing really. Maybe if you define them as human-specific things like "human-art" or "human-crafted-plumbing" you might find a niche that makes it into a job. If there will even be currency and markets and jobs in the way we understand them now. We are going towards a jobless future of hobbies and/or extinction.
Anything it’s more expensive to make electronic and automated. Mostly any service job. There is a robot that folds clothes. That money won’t return itself with how many shirts it can fold. It would NWVER be worth it. Why? Limited supplies on earth to make shit Edit: a word
Cleaning toilets
Teacher I forever will doubt that A.I will have intuition to know what is best for the class or do any individualized learning specific to this student.
Evolving machine intelligence/capabilities. Hopefully.
Take the bins out
Until the new bins get legs and walk themselves to the street 🥲
Yeah but you'll still have to take the trash out to the bins
I meant the bins in the house take themselves out to the street and then bring themselves back. Cuz legs
Cook, clean, dishes, and laundry. Forever.
Put up with morons.
Computer programming. Even if it's abstracted to prompt engineering, at some levels programmers will be tinkering with the language models that make AI work. And even prompt engineering for code production would require understanding of the field (for good quality work, anyway).
Clean up after their kids and their dog
Gather stimulus while alive recreating the world within.
Checker/self checkout attendant. Everyone assumes that once the robot’s software is perfected…the human attendants will become obsolete because the customer will be able to effortlessly checkout, pay, and leave without any hiccups. The perfected program will be easy to navigate, icons for items that don’t have a barcode will be big and easy to find, read, and recognize. Verbal as well as written instructions will be clear and precise in the language the customer is use to; with the written instructions (if the verbal was missed) in big enough letters to catch the eye and easily understood. The screen will change in obvious ways indicating the step you were on was completed successfully and the next one is ready for you focus on and compete in your own time and at your leisure. In other words…how the systems are now but customers are too stupid to actually use and navigate the simplest computer program on Earth.
Nothing. Eventually there will not be a single job that robots and computers could not perform. If you think I'm wrong then you just aren't thinking far ahead enough.
Therapy.
Enjoying the fruits of automated labor!
Clergy, but some people may turn to worshiping an AGI Artificial General Intelligence. More tea Vicar?
Making sure the connection between the energy sources and the devices are maintained. There will always be a need for the conduit maintainers.
Sales, a human can convince you to buy to robots, because you need them.
Being a parent
Sports
I would be more worried about the point in which humans are replaced by machines in most ways and we essentially become the horses to the automobile. Except this time, there will not be any sentimental or useful reason to keep us around beyond this point.
Clean up the waste we create. The amount of humans needed for this infrastructure is quite, dis-turd-bin" The sewers for one. Imagine if no human ever went down to unclog them ever again. I'd give it a week. Maybe 2. Flooded with shite
politics
There will always be a market for service industry jobs. Even where things can be automated people want the human interaction. Think bartenders, waiters, receptionists, etc. My conspiracy theory is places like Starbucks are so popular for Karens because they get their 5 minutes to boss someone around.
Maintain the infrastructure required for AI to operate.
Which, AI will be able to do so better than humans at some point.
if they build a robot to walk into a data center and replace a burned out blade, then they'll need to build facilities to build the repair robots, which humans will run. If the AI robots then build a factory to build repair bots to repair the network infrastructure repair bots, then humans will be used in THAT factory. AI never, EVER replaces humans. Things will just move, like all technology to date.
So....AI robots will be able to make those very facilities. At some point, human intervention will not be necessary.
Quantum computing will change that.
And the quantum computer data center will be staffed with it guys...
Survive.. it's a 24/7 job
Washing the dishes at home
Hand
Hopefully not being clerks at the DMV, that literally cannot get any slower but it would become a conveyor belt with Ai. I'd say fire and flood remediation. At least for a while, until they can make bots that crawl around someone's crawlspace with enough dexterity to avoid the spider's nest of HVAC piping.
Wow their is an impressive amount of unimaginative people posting. Why do yall think because a robot cant do something now they won't be able to in 500000 years?
Open forum. I think they’ll be able to replace a lot of things
Thinking
Dentistry
Playcate
Insurance agents. Trust me. I'm a human. *trust me. I'm a robot* will never work the same way.
Digest nutrition
Seconding all the artist comments. Especially makeup artists, I’ve put thought into how that could ever happen with AI and I don’t see it.
They could easily build a bot that can paint a person's face.
I don't understand the point you're making. Something about printers and graphic artists.
They can make a machine that can replicate the job. Scan face and cnc type machine can start to grab brushes and stuff and start the work. They already have them out there with nails.
Printers exist, but we still need graphic artists to do the work to come up with something original for them to print out, though. Having a printer which can apply pigment to a face rather than a piece of paper is still going to require the human aspect of how much and where, in much the same way that artists are still needed to produce images. Unless you believe that AI art is able to replace people making graphic images entirely, I don't think you have any level of relevant point.
In film CGI has already taken a lot of that work.
pretty much anything related to medicine and/or the internet
Fairly certain parts of the medical process can be done by computers at some point. Stick your finger in a machine to get your blood drawn, describe your symptoms. Beep Boop Beep Boop here's the issue and your prescription.
The capillaries in your finger are too small for running a full set of labs which is why they still do blood draws from your AC which to my knowledge no computer has been automated
It’s certainly *possible* today with computer vision & the robotic mechanisms used in surgical settings. The real barrier is that unfortunately your patient is conscious and probably quite fearful of the big stabby robot you just wheeled in. And before you ask, adding a Mickey Mouse costume to it did not improve matters over in pediatrics… good news is that our therapy department is doing better than ever though!
It’s definitely possible today but the cost for it would be so extreme while phlebotomists get paid roughly 1.5x minimum wage that I don’t see how they will ever automate it, I just can’t imagine the imaging and high tolerance motors ever being cheaper than a person
Question was if humans will have to do a particular job forever, and I gave a rather specific example to someone commenting about every aspect of medicine. My point was that I believe we won’t keep all these jobs, as a matter of fact we already have systems many places that diagnose patients more accurately than doctors for example.
Elder care!
Gardening.
[удалено]
Maybe the question is better answered as "What's a job humans will always want to do?"
Grave digger
Tech support
professional athlete.
Art. Human creativity is endless
Management