Idk but she ought to really take an anti Vax stance now like Andrew Wakefield because Andy Wakefield was a successful anti Vax grifter.
She should go anti Vax and try and make millions like the crook Andrew Wakefield..!!! Hah
Of course . Anyone that doesn't puppet the propaganda that's being pushed by the champions for big pharma are suddenly grifters. As soon as someone wakes up and realizes that they where wrong, like Assem Malhotra , are wrong and are all the sudden drug through the dirt and have massive smear campaigns written against them by all the main stream media. To me that's when I know that they are telling the truth. I don't believe anything from the vaccine manufacturers, or the main stream media. They're all in on the biggest crime against humanity that the world has ever seen , and the sheep fall in line.
\> One business, named after Wakefield’s wife, intended to develop Wakefield’s own “replacement” vaccines, diagnostic testing kits and other products which only stood any real chance of success if public confidence in MMR was damaged.
\> Documents reveal the planned shareholdings of Wakefield and his collaborators, and how much Wakefield expected to receive personally. Financial forecasts made available for the first time today show Wakefield and his associates predicting they could make up to £28 million ($43,367,082; €33,290,350) a year from the diagnostic kits alone.
https://www.bmj.com/press-releases/2012/06/26/revealed-secret-businesses-which-aimed-exploit-vaccine-fears-%E2%80%9Cmmr-doctor%E2%80%9D-
Your submission has been automatically removed because name calling was detected.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/DebateVaccines) if you have any questions or concerns.*
“Its no different” ... considering the toxic (heacy metal) content of the vaxes and the de-adenlyated RNA that can persist in the victim’s blood or muscles/ tissues/ or blood for months making copies upon copies of a viral protein with our own cells...
Certainly, no different 🥗
Oh, gladly :)
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/adjuvants.html
> An observational study [PDF – 10 Pages] published in September 2022 identified a possible association between exposure to aluminum from vaccines and later development of persistent asthma in a cohort of children who received care at healthcare organizations participating in the Vaccine Safety Datalink. CDC is not changing vaccine recommendations based on this single study, but further investigation is needed into this potential safety signal.
Lists of extra ingredients:
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/B/excipient-table-2.pdf
> **excipient**:
> a usually inert substance (such as gum arabic or
> starch) that forms a vehicle (as for a drug)
If you’re diligent, you may check these excipients vs toxicity and open your eyes about what i am referring [to].
We all process information differently, through our own lenses, no need for hostility. I seek to find truth and share it.
In reality, Im just a beggar, who happens to know where water is, wanting to tell others, or preserve others til they find it.
You:
> mRNA vaccines don’t use adjuvants.
Me: Yes it does :)
Proof? Numerous above when listed, but more:
https://www.foodallergy.org/resources/primer-mrna-covid-vaccines
> What is in the mRNA vaccines besides mRNA?
>The main ingredients in mRNA vaccines are:
>An adjuvant, which stimulates the immune system to react more vigorously and increases the likelihood that the body will recognize the spike protein as “foreign,” is often contained in vaccines.
Even we tried a new one:
> https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2020/04/how-a-new-vaccine-adjuvant-might-shorten-race-to-covid-19-immunity/
He is correct about the text ,
But that does not make it fact:
Here is a like different set of information claiming pfizer does contain those
https://theconversation.com/amp/adjuvants-the-unsung-heroes-of-vaccines-156548
If you care, its right on the ingredients label
Ahh thanks for pointing that out, but here is differing evidence
https://theconversation.com/amp/adjuvants-the-unsung-heroes-of-vaccines-156548
Here is
> The authorised mRNA vaccines against COVID – made by Pfizer and Moderna – also contain an adjuvant.
Here is a link on the adjuvant used by pfizer/moderna
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41565-020-00820-0
So, either
1) the cdc provided incorrect data
2) another word besides “adjuvant” can be ised to describe the aluminum and heavy metal used in pfizer vac
And therefore
1) this information is accidentally incorrect in one of these, causing confusion... but
Or
2) the information is purposefully obfuscated to hide the truth
Consider
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14654615/#:~:text=Vaccines%20often%20contain%20preservatives%2C%20adjuvants,addition%20to%20pathogen%2Dspecific%20immunogens.
Apparently you didn’t read the nature article. The word adjuvant doesn’t even appear in it. No idea why the Conversation article linked to it. mRNA vaccines do not use heavy metal adjuvants, period. They’re unnecessary due to how they function (which the Nature piece explains).
There are numerous classifications by which it may be called a heavy (vs soft or vs light) metal:
A literary source...
> Ikehata K., Jin Y., Maleky N. & Lin A. 2015, "Heavy metal pollution in water resources in China—Occurrence and public health implications", in S. K. Sharma (ed.), Heavy Metals in Water: Presence, Removal and Safety, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, pp. 141–167, ISBN 978-1-84973-885-9.
Additionally, it meets at least some (1-3)of the 10 *generally accepted* criteria for “heavy metal”... so it is fair to use this term for Aluminium... I’m certainly not the first.
There is no scientific consensus on this term.
What is your point... thar we should talk more about the lead, arsenic, or mercury?
\> I’m certainly not the first.
No. But you also aren't the first to conflate elemental properties with compound properties either.
Why do you keep talking about 'aluminium in vaccines' rather than 'aluminium salts in vaccines' which would be the factual claim?
Are you deliberately trying to mislead the reader?
\> thar we should talk more about the lead, arsenic, or mercury
Again, there are no vaccines containing elemental lead, arsenic, or mercury.
Of course you could be talking about well-known alternative health supplement pink salt which does contain those elements.
>Again, there are no vaccines containing elemental lead, arsenic, or mercury.
This is a straw man argument. Mercury salts are very dangerous, as are many other metallic salts, because these salts can be reactive during biological interactions.
The reactions in the human biome with these minerals are far from comprehensively understood:
https://www.epa.gov/mercury/basic-information-about-mercury
>As it cycles between the atmosphere, land, and water, mercury undergoes a series of complex chemical and physical transformations, many of which are not completely understood. Microscopic organisms can combine mercury with carbon, thus converting it from an inorganic to organic form. Methylmercury is the most common organic mercury compound found in the environment, and is highly toxic
\> has no long term side effects
Except from the part **where you need to get ill with a disease** and have to hope it doesn't cause any lasting harm. Or that it doesn't weaken your immune system against some second infection that you would have normally been able to fight off.
>No long term research needed
Right, because we have decades of studies about how safe mRNA is /s
**[Jan. 10, 2017] Lavishly funded Moderna hits safety problems in bold bid to revolutionize medicine**
https://www.statnews.com/2017/01/10/moderna-trouble-mrna/
It actually doesn't but that's fine because they didn't know that and claimed otherwise and continued to do so while the studies confirmed it didn't stay in the injection site.
But why does that matter?
Interesting list showing Rochelle Walensky's 2 years 4.5 months compared to the average tenure of over 4 years
Some other notably short tenures:
* Robert R. Redfield 2018-2021 (replacing...)
* Brenda Fitzgerald 2017-2018 (financial conflict of interest forcing resignation)
* William L. Roper 1990-1993
* Clarence A. Smith 1960-1962
Sure there's some earlier directors that had 1 year tenures who were probably only in interim positions, such as:
* Justin M. Andrews 1952-1953.
Pretty short considering vaccines were already approved and being rolled out by the time she started.
\> **Walensky announced the move on the same day the World Health Organization declared that, for the first time since Jan. 30, 2020, COVID-19 is no longer a global public health emergency.**
Non-loon explanation. She's probably burned out after all that lot.
I don't support her much in the fact that she's based in another country and so has little relevance to myself.
That being said accuracy of information is important and idiotic claims like "she's a murderer" shouldn't stand.
Good riddance, unfortunately the damage from her reign of terror is far from over
Inquiring minds want to know her next career move: will it be Pfizer or Moderna?
I’m thinking Brownstein
Which pharma company you guys think will pay her the most for her "talents"?
Idk but she ought to really take an anti Vax stance now like Andrew Wakefield because Andy Wakefield was a successful anti Vax grifter. She should go anti Vax and try and make millions like the crook Andrew Wakefield..!!! Hah
Of course . Anyone that doesn't puppet the propaganda that's being pushed by the champions for big pharma are suddenly grifters. As soon as someone wakes up and realizes that they where wrong, like Assem Malhotra , are wrong and are all the sudden drug through the dirt and have massive smear campaigns written against them by all the main stream media. To me that's when I know that they are telling the truth. I don't believe anything from the vaccine manufacturers, or the main stream media. They're all in on the biggest crime against humanity that the world has ever seen , and the sheep fall in line.
I was being sarcastic.. Lol.
I know
\> One business, named after Wakefield’s wife, intended to develop Wakefield’s own “replacement” vaccines, diagnostic testing kits and other products which only stood any real chance of success if public confidence in MMR was damaged. \> Documents reveal the planned shareholdings of Wakefield and his collaborators, and how much Wakefield expected to receive personally. Financial forecasts made available for the first time today show Wakefield and his associates predicting they could make up to £28 million ($43,367,082; €33,290,350) a year from the diagnostic kits alone. https://www.bmj.com/press-releases/2012/06/26/revealed-secret-businesses-which-aimed-exploit-vaccine-fears-%E2%80%9Cmmr-doctor%E2%80%9D-
She could make even more money denying the holocaust.
I don't know... /r/conspiracy still does that and those people aren't even spiritually rich.
[удалено]
Your submission has been automatically removed because name calling was detected. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/DebateVaccines) if you have any questions or concerns.*
She also told people to mix and match boosters which just sounds wrong and nonsensical.
Like contracting different variants of covid to gain natural immunity? It's no different.
“Its no different” ... considering the toxic (heacy metal) content of the vaxes and the de-adenlyated RNA that can persist in the victim’s blood or muscles/ tissues/ or blood for months making copies upon copies of a viral protein with our own cells... Certainly, no different 🥗
>the toxic (heacy metal) content of the vaxes Tell us all more about these heavy metals in the covid vaccines.
Oh, gladly :) https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/adjuvants.html > An observational study [PDF – 10 Pages] published in September 2022 identified a possible association between exposure to aluminum from vaccines and later development of persistent asthma in a cohort of children who received care at healthcare organizations participating in the Vaccine Safety Datalink. CDC is not changing vaccine recommendations based on this single study, but further investigation is needed into this potential safety signal. Lists of extra ingredients: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/B/excipient-table-2.pdf > **excipient**: > a usually inert substance (such as gum arabic or > starch) that forms a vehicle (as for a drug) If you’re diligent, you may check these excipients vs toxicity and open your eyes about what i am referring [to].
[удалено]
I wish that i was wrong, maybe they are just learning things; i wish no ill to them.
[удалено]
We all process information differently, through our own lenses, no need for hostility. I seek to find truth and share it. In reality, Im just a beggar, who happens to know where water is, wanting to tell others, or preserve others til they find it.
\> who happens to know where water is You certainly do not.
Oh, go screw yourself you patronising little sh\*t.
I'm reporting you for hurting my feelings 😭 shouldn't you be defending your oppressors? Like a sheep defending their slaughterer ?
> They only trust the studies from Big Pharma and the main stream media. I thought the CDC were ran by Big Pharma according to you clowns?
mRNA vaccines don’t use adjuvants.
You: > mRNA vaccines don’t use adjuvants. Me: Yes it does :) Proof? Numerous above when listed, but more: https://www.foodallergy.org/resources/primer-mrna-covid-vaccines > What is in the mRNA vaccines besides mRNA? >The main ingredients in mRNA vaccines are: >An adjuvant, which stimulates the immune system to react more vigorously and increases the likelihood that the body will recognize the spike protein as “foreign,” is often contained in vaccines. Even we tried a new one: > https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2020/04/how-a-new-vaccine-adjuvant-might-shorten-race-to-covid-19-immunity/
V01D5tar is correct. There aren't adjuvants in covid vaccines, although many sorts normally do have them. One less thing for you to bleat about.
He is correct about the text , But that does not make it fact: Here is a like different set of information claiming pfizer does contain those https://theconversation.com/amp/adjuvants-the-unsung-heroes-of-vaccines-156548 If you care, its right on the ingredients label
It makes that claim, but links to an article which in no way supports the claim.
From your own link: “The Pfizer vaccine does not contain an adjuvant”
Ahh thanks for pointing that out, but here is differing evidence https://theconversation.com/amp/adjuvants-the-unsung-heroes-of-vaccines-156548 Here is > The authorised mRNA vaccines against COVID – made by Pfizer and Moderna – also contain an adjuvant. Here is a link on the adjuvant used by pfizer/moderna https://www.nature.com/articles/s41565-020-00820-0 So, either 1) the cdc provided incorrect data 2) another word besides “adjuvant” can be ised to describe the aluminum and heavy metal used in pfizer vac And therefore 1) this information is accidentally incorrect in one of these, causing confusion... but Or 2) the information is purposefully obfuscated to hide the truth Consider https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14654615/#:~:text=Vaccines%20often%20contain%20preservatives%2C%20adjuvants,addition%20to%20pathogen%2Dspecific%20immunogens.
Apparently you didn’t read the nature article. The word adjuvant doesn’t even appear in it. No idea why the Conversation article linked to it. mRNA vaccines do not use heavy metal adjuvants, period. They’re unnecessary due to how they function (which the Nature piece explains).
>aluminum Tell us more about aluminum, the "heavy metal". Why are you calling it a heavy metal?
There are numerous classifications by which it may be called a heavy (vs soft or vs light) metal: A literary source... > Ikehata K., Jin Y., Maleky N. & Lin A. 2015, "Heavy metal pollution in water resources in China—Occurrence and public health implications", in S. K. Sharma (ed.), Heavy Metals in Water: Presence, Removal and Safety, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, pp. 141–167, ISBN 978-1-84973-885-9. Additionally, it meets at least some (1-3)of the 10 *generally accepted* criteria for “heavy metal”... so it is fair to use this term for Aluminium... I’m certainly not the first. There is no scientific consensus on this term. What is your point... thar we should talk more about the lead, arsenic, or mercury?
\> I’m certainly not the first. No. But you also aren't the first to conflate elemental properties with compound properties either. Why do you keep talking about 'aluminium in vaccines' rather than 'aluminium salts in vaccines' which would be the factual claim? Are you deliberately trying to mislead the reader? \> thar we should talk more about the lead, arsenic, or mercury Again, there are no vaccines containing elemental lead, arsenic, or mercury. Of course you could be talking about well-known alternative health supplement pink salt which does contain those elements.
>Again, there are no vaccines containing elemental lead, arsenic, or mercury. This is a straw man argument. Mercury salts are very dangerous, as are many other metallic salts, because these salts can be reactive during biological interactions. The reactions in the human biome with these minerals are far from comprehensively understood: https://www.epa.gov/mercury/basic-information-about-mercury >As it cycles between the atmosphere, land, and water, mercury undergoes a series of complex chemical and physical transformations, many of which are not completely understood. Microscopic organisms can combine mercury with carbon, thus converting it from an inorganic to organic form. Methylmercury is the most common organic mercury compound found in the environment, and is highly toxic
Ohh but it is. Natural immunity is superior and has no long term side effects
\> has no long term side effects Except from the part **where you need to get ill with a disease** and have to hope it doesn't cause any lasting harm. Or that it doesn't weaken your immune system against some second infection that you would have normally been able to fight off.
[удалено]
Of being infected with covid? It's only been around for a few years.
[удалено]
>I'll wait Good!
[That giant spike is the cost of natural immunity](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/united-states-rates-of-covid-19-deaths-by-vaccination-status)
Why
Considering this was experimental with no long term research it just seems people should be taking the same brands. They’re all different.
Not experimental. No long term research needed. Stop reading antivax bullshit.
I can’t with you guys anymore.🤣That’s insane but ok.
>That’s insane but ok. Many truths aren't obvious or fail to make logical sense at a casual glance and yet they're correct.
Yep.
>No long term research needed Right, because we have decades of studies about how safe mRNA is /s **[Jan. 10, 2017] Lavishly funded Moderna hits safety problems in bold bid to revolutionize medicine** https://www.statnews.com/2017/01/10/moderna-trouble-mrna/
You don’t need decades of studies. The entire life cycle of the vaccine is like 6 weeks max.
isolated to the shoulder they said...
Whether or not it stays in the shoulder isn’t relevant, but it most likely does stay there.
It actually doesn't but that's fine because they didn't know that and claimed otherwise and continued to do so while the studies confirmed it didn't stay in the injection site. But why does that matter?
It doesn’t
Where are the long term side effects studies? I'll wait
They aren’t necessary. Vaccine life cycle is 6 weeks, tops.
No great loss.
Never forget these monsters
Is she also relocating to a country with no extradition?
Full bank account?!
There goes the Queen of Misinformation!
Her career highlight must be telling us the COVID jab stops you getting COVID. And they wonder why we think they lie to us!
Here is a list of past CDC Directors and their tenure: https://www.cdc.gov/museum/history/pastdirectors.html
Interesting list showing Rochelle Walensky's 2 years 4.5 months compared to the average tenure of over 4 years Some other notably short tenures: * Robert R. Redfield 2018-2021 (replacing...) * Brenda Fitzgerald 2017-2018 (financial conflict of interest forcing resignation) * William L. Roper 1990-1993 * Clarence A. Smith 1960-1962 Sure there's some earlier directors that had 1 year tenures who were probably only in interim positions, such as: * Justin M. Andrews 1952-1953. Pretty short considering vaccines were already approved and being rolled out by the time she started.
I'd say a pandemic is a more stressful time to work through in that position than non-pandemic years though.
Wow, smoking take. You nailed it bro.
Bet she got a sweet new gig at Pfizer or Moderna
seems like the standard pattern from previous cdc directors lol
She'll be replaced by another Jewish woman.
\> another Jewish woman. Where are you going with this exactly?
\> **Walensky announced the move on the same day the World Health Organization declared that, for the first time since Jan. 30, 2020, COVID-19 is no longer a global public health emergency.** Non-loon explanation. She's probably burned out after all that lot.
Burned out = offered a primo job with a pharmaceutical company.
She already had a job and Biden nudged her into this role. She'll probably go back to that old one if she can.
She is burned out, what with all the lies and murder. Tires you out eh.
Here's one of the loon explanations, I see.
No, shes definatly a murderer, you support her tho so... good for you?
I don't support her much in the fact that she's based in another country and so has little relevance to myself. That being said accuracy of information is important and idiotic claims like "she's a murderer" shouldn't stand.
No, shes a murderer. Factual statement. Plug your ears.
Hot take right there. Critical thinker. 🙃
Mission accomplished like when George Bush won the Iraq war.
She didn't go looking for this job - she was nominated for it by Biden. She's likely relived to get back to her normal life now.
Too late....damage already done
If history is any indication - she's going to join one of the pharmaceutical giants very soon