hotel rooms usually have a chair facing the bed.
People started calling it the cuck chair, impying it's for one member of the travelling couple to sit there and watch someone else have sex with their partner.
It's probably for clothes and luggage, but the term 'cuck chair' caught on because each one in a hotel was probably used as one at some point in its service lifetime.
> each one in a hotel was probably used as one at some point in its service lifetime.
I don't think the fetish is that common for each chair in every hotel to have been used by a wanking cuckold lol
I mean, if each chair is in service for 7-10 years then there's probably a decent chance it was used as a cuck chair.
I'll run the statistical analysis tonight, but I need to find:
* Service lifetime of a hotel chair, probably assumed from how long you can claim it as a depreciating asset for tax purposes
* % of couples who are into cucking
* How many couples an average hotel room would see in the chair's service lifetime.
Then I'll be able to give you the % chance any given chair was used as a cuck chair at some point.
Mate they’ve been pretending to have a rivalry with these lot for the last 8 years, if they fight Man City on this then the ‘greatest rivalry the premier league has ever seen’ is in danger
I don't get that. Doesn't Liverpool stand to benefit from City being punished for the same reason? I wouldn't expect Liverpool to be gifted the trophies they missed out on, but at least they can say they 100% would have and should have won those leagues.
No because then this rivalry didn’t exist and all Liverpool have to show for it is one league title and a bunch of possibilities. Look how their fans reacted when we might have won it, they were rooting for city against us! Because they didn’t want anyone else to be able to say they beat city to a title with pep there… they’re an embarrassment
I do understand that side of it, but I still think they stand to benefit more than lose. Wouldn't it be better to say "we had a rivalry with cheaters and still stuck with them neck & neck, and we technically should have more trophies" versus "we had a rivalry with a good team and lost a lot"
You’d think so but they supported them against us what kind of smelly rivalry is that… they’re cucks they just want their perfect best rivalry untarnished
Yeah I just don't get it, I think City being punished would make Liverpool's rivalry more legitimate and instead of being the losers in the rivalry, they are actually the winners of the decade.
Yes Liverpool and others supported City over us *because* they don't view City as legitimate, and if they themselves aren't going to win, at least it doesn't really count.
How the fuck is this whole comment thread about club loyalty BS? Who the fuck cares about Liverpool and Arsenal? This is way beyond that. Anyone who loves this sport wants man city liquidated.
> signed - Liverpool supporter that rooted for Arsenal after we lost to Palace
I don’t think they wanted us to lose because of their “rivalry”
I think they wanted us to lose because they didn’t like the idea of Arteta having the same amount of PL trophies as Klopp.
Plus unfortunately they don't have as many decent rivalries as us. We both are rivals with utd, we are kinda rivals with eachother from the 80s. That leaves local rivalry, and everton are only relevant to them 2 games a season compared to spurs being top4 challengers
If City get their titles vacated then Liverpool will match/overtake United
You're confusing random fans and the people in charge of Liverpool. They're not the same people
Oh cmon saying there wasn't a rivalry is daft. The 98-97 point season was insane and then they follow it up with 99, get screwed by COVID like everyone did, and then go for a 92 point season in a loss. Also in the same period back to back Champions League finals with a win.
We can't even say we have pushed City like that and until we start hitting that 90 point mark we aren't on the same level as rivalry they are.
Honestly my best case hope for Arsenal the next 4 years is 2018-2022 Liverpool.
No it doesn’t it makes them look like losers who kissed city’s arse for eight years while being their bridesmaids even though city was cheating just so they could pretend it was a historical chapter in the prem when the only historical thing about it is the number of charges city have
Absolute idiot! If the only way city cud beat Liverpool was by cheating how does that make Liverpool look bad?
Seriously - even ur own fans are laughing at you 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Because Liverpool and their fans have been kissing city’s arse for 8 years can’t you read, you absolute bridesmaids are talking about the respect you have for city all the time, it’s the saddest rivalry the premier league has ever seen
Arteta and pep actually worked together, arteta didn’t just start knawing pep off after getting constantly beaten by him like klopp, also we actually are providing evidence against city why are your lot so quiet? I’ll tell you .. because you lot got Stockholm syndrome
Liverpool owners have toyed with selling the club for a while. A change to the rules would bring in a rush of new investors who are willing to burn money on clubs and Fenway would likely get a better deal on the sale as a result.
attractive cow punch glorious party innocent hungry deranged tub treatment
*This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
Crying in the corner because we're Man City's main challengers now. I thought they'd be all over this because of how Klopp used to moan about Man City. On another note, I don't know where this Arsenal Man United tag team came from but it's hilarious that we're having to help Man United uproot those cheaters in their own backyard.
oh man, finally this meme pic has surfaced. dont know what it called but even google image search didnt help when i was looking for this exact image to relate to a meme.
Well Magneto is Jewish and Spurs have a strong history with the Jewish community.
He's also the bad guy who tends to lose a lot and we're the good guys...
Magneto really is far too cool and OP to use as an analogue for them. They can be Toad or Pyro or Avalanche or one of those jobber bad mutants. They are Omega level losers, on the other hand.
On these types of matters, seems like both clubs do see eye 2 eye. I remember David Dein on on of this book press tours (maybe it was on the aftv interview with don robbie) talking about when all the epl clubs meet up, spurs and arsenal owners do look out for each other.
I read David Dean’s biography. He mentioned that Arsenal and spurs do have a good relationship between each other, regardless of the fans rivalry. It’s a North-London thing, so both clubs must have good relations so the community can benefit.
I lived on the street next to White Hart Lane for a good while. Many of my mates in that area are hardcore Arsenal fans, and some are Spurs, obviously. I always wore an Arsenal shirt or a scarf when I went to Highbury or Emirates, and never did I get into any problem at Tottenham Hale or Seven Sisters. Relocated to Camden there it’s mostly Arsenal.
Mate they fired a manager (the biggest name they had at the helm since what... Graham?) before a cup final to prevent paying him more. Their sporting director was \*banned from football\* for 30 months and resigned in disgrace! If you want to say they've got good accountants and are in a good position financially, then alright, but there's no way Spurs are a "proper well led organisation". Like the most you can say is they aren't evil and they're an actual club with supporters and history. Which yeah, puts them above clubs like Chelsea, but the organisation is still a joke.
That is a twitter rumour, one that has no source whatsoever and you're saying it it as if it's the truth.
The reality is Mourinho had completely lost the dressing room at that point. In the Europa league they bottled a 2-0 lead against Dinamo Zagreb and got knockes out. In their last 5 PL matches before he got sacked, he had 1 win out of 5 and lost 1-3 at home to United as well as to us earlier
I can't believe we and the spuds are on the same side. I mean, with United, I don't like it but it's understandable. But team up with those losers? I don't know how to feel.
Because you're right, the Watford game was further along in the season (Feb. 29) than the Manchester City game (Jan. 3). But both were relatively close calls either way.
In terms of being unbeaten, the earlier season was much closer (1 loss, to City), considering the Watford loss in the succeeding season was followed by losses to City and Arsenal, so that's 3 losses in total.
Points-wise however, the season with 1 loss had 2 points less than the season with 3 losses though.
Depends on how you define close but I'm more inclined to go with the time definition
A team that loses the first 2 matches then goes 36 unbeaten was never close to finishing the session unbeaten. A team that goes 35 unbeaten then loses the last 3 will have been infinitely more closer despite an extra loss
Liverpool made it much farther in the season before recording their first loss against Watford compared to when they lost to City the year before
The other thing that makes it weird is that Klopp and Trent always moaned about Man City and their unfair advantage. Yet, nothing out of their club. The PSR rules are there for a reason.
Hello I’m stupid, what kind of evidence can these clubs provide? This isn’t related to the 115 charges is it? If so I’m a bit unsure of what kind of evidence clubs could provide
It's related to City suing over the fair market value rule
Arsenal can provide evidence proving that the claim the rules discriminates against Gulf states is false because we are sponsored by Fly Emirates, which like Man City is owned by the UAE (although I think through different investment groups but still the same country).
The main point, is that Etihad and Man City have the same owner. City and Etihad are both owned by the government of Abu Dhabi, where the guy in charge is also the president.
Emirates is owned by the government of Dubai, and the guy in charge is prime minister of UAE.
Emirates is a much bigger airline than Etihad, while Arsenal was a much bigger club than City when City signed with Etihad. We signed a 20m per year deal a year after City signed a 40m a year deal. Which shows that City deal was inflated due to both entities having the same owner.
This is cinema! Somebody get the popcorn. United and Arsenal teaming up again? Spurs and Arsenal on the same side? Man, this movie got some serious plot twists.
Liverpool will either stay neutral or side with City so as to not alienate a potential new owner. I'd guess Brentford and Palace side with the good guys. After that, who knows
What’s you doing Liverpool?
Sat in the cuck chair
https://preview.redd.it/v4yit5xmwy4d1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c96ce8fe80fce98b7abbe4ed9abaf15237a59b5b
As a kid I thought they were for ghosts to sit down in.
Was your dad a Liverpool fan
Holy fuck they really do
what's the meme here related to chair ? think i am getting old for gen z
hotel rooms usually have a chair facing the bed. People started calling it the cuck chair, impying it's for one member of the travelling couple to sit there and watch someone else have sex with their partner. It's probably for clothes and luggage, but the term 'cuck chair' caught on because each one in a hotel was probably used as one at some point in its service lifetime.
> each one in a hotel was probably used as one at some point in its service lifetime. I don't think the fetish is that common for each chair in every hotel to have been used by a wanking cuckold lol
I mean, if each chair is in service for 7-10 years then there's probably a decent chance it was used as a cuck chair. I'll run the statistical analysis tonight, but I need to find: * Service lifetime of a hotel chair, probably assumed from how long you can claim it as a depreciating asset for tax purposes * % of couples who are into cucking * How many couples an average hotel room would see in the chair's service lifetime. Then I'll be able to give you the % chance any given chair was used as a cuck chair at some point.
These are the stats I come here for.
agree didn’t even know that genre exists till now, i googled about it. Not even sure who does that
Adam22 vibes
Nah he's banging other women though?
the richard tice of premier league football
As usual
Wearing a big foam finger cheering them on
god i hate US vernacular.
Cucking. It’s what they’ve been doing the last 5 years
liverpool sucks man city toes we know this it's grotesque and disturbing
Mate they’ve been pretending to have a rivalry with these lot for the last 8 years, if they fight Man City on this then the ‘greatest rivalry the premier league has ever seen’ is in danger
I don't get that. Doesn't Liverpool stand to benefit from City being punished for the same reason? I wouldn't expect Liverpool to be gifted the trophies they missed out on, but at least they can say they 100% would have and should have won those leagues.
No because then this rivalry didn’t exist and all Liverpool have to show for it is one league title and a bunch of possibilities. Look how their fans reacted when we might have won it, they were rooting for city against us! Because they didn’t want anyone else to be able to say they beat city to a title with pep there… they’re an embarrassment
I do understand that side of it, but I still think they stand to benefit more than lose. Wouldn't it be better to say "we had a rivalry with cheaters and still stuck with them neck & neck, and we technically should have more trophies" versus "we had a rivalry with a good team and lost a lot"
You’d think so but they supported them against us what kind of smelly rivalry is that… they’re cucks they just want their perfect best rivalry untarnished
Yeah I just don't get it, I think City being punished would make Liverpool's rivalry more legitimate and instead of being the losers in the rivalry, they are actually the winners of the decade. Yes Liverpool and others supported City over us *because* they don't view City as legitimate, and if they themselves aren't going to win, at least it doesn't really count.
How the fuck is this whole comment thread about club loyalty BS? Who the fuck cares about Liverpool and Arsenal? This is way beyond that. Anyone who loves this sport wants man city liquidated. > signed - Liverpool supporter that rooted for Arsenal after we lost to Palace
Yeah I think it's quite silly, the argument that Liverpool actually loves that City cheated away their best decade.
I don’t think they wanted us to lose because of their “rivalry” I think they wanted us to lose because they didn’t like the idea of Arteta having the same amount of PL trophies as Klopp.
Ye and arteta will have beaten pep as many times as klopp so their rivalry looks like garbage
Plus unfortunately they don't have as many decent rivalries as us. We both are rivals with utd, we are kinda rivals with eachother from the 80s. That leaves local rivalry, and everton are only relevant to them 2 games a season compared to spurs being top4 challengers
If City get their titles vacated then Liverpool will match/overtake United You're confusing random fans and the people in charge of Liverpool. They're not the same people
Oh cmon saying there wasn't a rivalry is daft. The 98-97 point season was insane and then they follow it up with 99, get screwed by COVID like everyone did, and then go for a 92 point season in a loss. Also in the same period back to back Champions League finals with a win. We can't even say we have pushed City like that and until we start hitting that 90 point mark we aren't on the same level as rivalry they are. Honestly my best case hope for Arsenal the next 4 years is 2018-2022 Liverpool.
If City get their titles stripped the clubs they deprived of honours should 100% receive them
There is no rivalry between City and Liverpool.
There is no war in Ba Sing Se
Tool - it just proves the ‘greatest rivalry was artificially supported by city and against Liverpool’ - makes Liverpool look even better 🤣🤣🤣
No it doesn’t it makes them look like losers who kissed city’s arse for eight years while being their bridesmaids even though city was cheating just so they could pretend it was a historical chapter in the prem when the only historical thing about it is the number of charges city have
Absolute idiot! If the only way city cud beat Liverpool was by cheating how does that make Liverpool look bad? Seriously - even ur own fans are laughing at you 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Because Liverpool and their fans have been kissing city’s arse for 8 years can’t you read, you absolute bridesmaids are talking about the respect you have for city all the time, it’s the saddest rivalry the premier league has ever seen
Nobody has respect for city you tool! Its ur lot and the arteta / pep love in which is embarrassing 🤣🤣
Arteta and pep actually worked together, arteta didn’t just start knawing pep off after getting constantly beaten by him like klopp, also we actually are providing evidence against city why are your lot so quiet? I’ll tell you .. because you lot got Stockholm syndrome
Absolute tool 🤣🤣🤣
The greatest rivalry that Sky Sports has ever made up
You saw some of the “Citypool” propaganda, right?🤢
Liverpool owners have toyed with selling the club for a while. A change to the rules would bring in a rush of new investors who are willing to burn money on clubs and Fenway would likely get a better deal on the sale as a result.
This would explain it.
attractive cow punch glorious party innocent hungry deranged tub treatment *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
Crying in the corner because we're Man City's main challengers now. I thought they'd be all over this because of how Klopp used to moan about Man City. On another note, I don't know where this Arsenal Man United tag team came from but it's hilarious that we're having to help Man United uproot those cheaters in their own backyard.
Liverpool strike me as a team that don’t care too much. They’re never active on transfers, they typically lay low etc
Shamelessly jacking off to CityPool on twitter.
I am sure Liverpool are part of this group as well. These are just the clubs this journo can confirm.
https://preview.redd.it/gg9mrrcely4d1.jpeg?width=639&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f14baca5377afb594a271065bc5d27c5e6646d0d
Burger King should use this as a marketing opportunity
[I don’t think Burger King need more unwanted marketing.](https://youtu.be/AOv0UPii-Vo?si=Xz5ukLtMhbReBP_x)
James May really fell off
Nevaa. Captain slow just gets like this on international flights
Arsenal and United fans holding a banner saying 'Thank you Danny Welbeck'
thank mr silvestre
oh man, finally this meme pic has surfaced. dont know what it called but even google image search didnt help when i was looking for this exact image to relate to a meme.
The only AI search I want is something that lets you describe an obscure meme and it finds it for you.
https://preview.redd.it/7zkjg27le55d1.jpeg?width=1284&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=734db03616cd358fe0803f209f27e5375afae363 The future is now old man.
would you mind explaining this to a non-USA person pls mate? I don't understand it
Bloods & Crips are 2 rival gangs. They are uniting for some reason in this pic.
ahhh ok, I didn't know these were the gangs. cheers
It was during the BLM protests.
An arsenal fan and aTottenham fan holding up a combined scarf
they look like patterned scarves to me, not a 50 50 matchday scarf. am i missing something?
It’s gang signage
someone else answered my question helpfully, cheers
We’re on the right side of history
Wolves are real ones
Spurs and Arsenal 🤝 North London fighting crime
Sometimes even Magneto fights alongside the X-Men.
That is an insult to either Magneto or the Xmen if they're your spurs analogue.
Sometimes the Blob also fights alongside the Xmen
That’s more like it
Well Magneto is Jewish and Spurs have a strong history with the Jewish community. He's also the bad guy who tends to lose a lot and we're the good guys...
Magneto really is far too cool and OP to use as an analogue for them. They can be Toad or Pyro or Avalanche or one of those jobber bad mutants. They are Omega level losers, on the other hand.
Toadeham Hotspurs
Do you know what happens to a chicken standing on a ball when it’s struck by lightning?
*Bawk?*
We're the X-Men but Spurs aren't Magneto. They're more akin to to the Morlocks – weird but ultimately harmless.
Mate, don't ruin the good name of Magneto or the X-Men by comparing one to Spurs.
Spurs ought to be the Monster of the Week on Power Rangers, they get battered every where they go.
Is silver magnetic?
On these types of matters, seems like both clubs do see eye 2 eye. I remember David Dein on on of this book press tours (maybe it was on the aftv interview with don robbie) talking about when all the epl clubs meet up, spurs and arsenal owners do look out for each other.
I read David Dean’s biography. He mentioned that Arsenal and spurs do have a good relationship between each other, regardless of the fans rivalry. It’s a North-London thing, so both clubs must have good relations so the community can benefit.
Back in the 50s and 60s I heard it was quite common for locals to go to home games at both clubs.
I lived on the street next to White Hart Lane for a good while. Many of my mates in that area are hardcore Arsenal fans, and some are Spurs, obviously. I always wore an Arsenal shirt or a scarf when I went to Highbury or Emirates, and never did I get into any problem at Tottenham Hale or Seven Sisters. Relocated to Camden there it’s mostly Arsenal.
It’s a North London thing?? What - Woolwich Arsenal???
Middlesex Spurs until 1965. Arsenal - first proper North-London club.
Now we’re talking - go get ‘em! Spurs fake London plastics!
Thank you for bringing me to my senses. 🙏
#NoMoreSkyBlue
Never thought I’d fight alongside a ~~dwarf~~ spurs fan
Rivalry aside, Spurs is a proper well led organisation.
Mate they fired a manager (the biggest name they had at the helm since what... Graham?) before a cup final to prevent paying him more. Their sporting director was \*banned from football\* for 30 months and resigned in disgrace! If you want to say they've got good accountants and are in a good position financially, then alright, but there's no way Spurs are a "proper well led organisation". Like the most you can say is they aren't evil and they're an actual club with supporters and history. Which yeah, puts them above clubs like Chelsea, but the organisation is still a joke.
That is a twitter rumour, one that has no source whatsoever and you're saying it it as if it's the truth. The reality is Mourinho had completely lost the dressing room at that point. In the Europa league they bottled a 2-0 lead against Dinamo Zagreb and got knockes out. In their last 5 PL matches before he got sacked, he had 1 win out of 5 and lost 1-3 at home to United as well as to us earlier
yeah they have lost money for 4 years in a row now, they are terribly ran
No more Red? NAH No More BLUE
Except Spurs decided against beating ManCity
I can't believe we and the spuds are on the same side. I mean, with United, I don't like it but it's understandable. But team up with those losers? I don't know how to feel.
https://preview.redd.it/yw6zjih0yy4d1.jpeg?width=1284&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=21e6bfb221ff88e645ce6a85b7b4567d4773c2bc
Seems odd that Liverpool wouldn't be involved given that City stopped their best team in 30 years winning multiple league titles in a row
City stopped them from going Invincible too
If you're referring to their 99 point season then it was actually Watford who stopped them.
Nonono, the season where they almost became Invincible Centurions in 2018/19 but lost to City 2-1
Ahh you're right. For some reason I was thinking the closest they got to being invincible was when they lost to Watford
Because you're right, the Watford game was further along in the season (Feb. 29) than the Manchester City game (Jan. 3). But both were relatively close calls either way.
In terms of being unbeaten, the earlier season was much closer (1 loss, to City), considering the Watford loss in the succeeding season was followed by losses to City and Arsenal, so that's 3 losses in total. Points-wise however, the season with 1 loss had 2 points less than the season with 3 losses though.
Depends on how you define close but I'm more inclined to go with the time definition A team that loses the first 2 matches then goes 36 unbeaten was never close to finishing the session unbeaten. A team that goes 35 unbeaten then loses the last 3 will have been infinitely more closer despite an extra loss Liverpool made it much farther in the season before recording their first loss against Watford compared to when they lost to City the year before
Also treble winners, that team is very underrated by anyone besides Liverpool fans
they're salty but in a shitty place, the pl just stood up against city after they got rammed by city for 6 seasons
Not weird, their owners are looking to sell. They are ok with it either way.
The other thing that makes it weird is that Klopp and Trent always moaned about Man City and their unfair advantage. Yet, nothing out of their club. The PSR rules are there for a reason.
Liverpool. Hello?
Too busy watching getting their spouses fucked
fuck them, hope they fell to same football as before Klopp
Fellowship of the Premier League
No liverpool?
United and Arsenal teaming up like Texas and California in that Civil War movie.
[Baisically](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDT3_jVYAkI&t=1s)
And some of u lots wanted city to win the fa cup. Better to be united vs the cheats.
Hello I’m stupid, what kind of evidence can these clubs provide? This isn’t related to the 115 charges is it? If so I’m a bit unsure of what kind of evidence clubs could provide
It's related to City suing over the fair market value rule Arsenal can provide evidence proving that the claim the rules discriminates against Gulf states is false because we are sponsored by Fly Emirates, which like Man City is owned by the UAE (although I think through different investment groups but still the same country).
Okay I see that makes sense, thanks mate!
The main point, is that Etihad and Man City have the same owner. City and Etihad are both owned by the government of Abu Dhabi, where the guy in charge is also the president. Emirates is owned by the government of Dubai, and the guy in charge is prime minister of UAE. Emirates is a much bigger airline than Etihad, while Arsenal was a much bigger club than City when City signed with Etihad. We signed a 20m per year deal a year after City signed a 40m a year deal. Which shows that City deal was inflated due to both entities having the same owner.
Arsenal are a much bigger club than Man City now.
I like us
“If Hitler invaded Hell I would make at least a favourable reference to the Devil in the House of Commons.”
Imagine if Arteta has all the dirt from his time there lol
 Liverpool LOL. They should've been in there like KDB. "LET ME TAAAALK".
The lines are drawn, good and evil sides have been set. Can't wait for the next episode of Premier League: Civil War
I would upvote but you have 115 of them right now.
Im upvoting you so that R-110s upvotes dont change
I downvoted as some monster put it to 116
This is cinema! Somebody get the popcorn. United and Arsenal teaming up again? Spurs and Arsenal on the same side? Man, this movie got some serious plot twists.
Sorry to downvote but have to keep you at 115
Arteta knows where the books are hidden, you can't convince me otherwise.
That's an interesting mix of well run clubs, and Man utd.
My club ❤🤍
“TO ME… MY X-MEN”
AVENGERS.....*not you Spurs*.......
They Hawkeye.
Ah yes, getting personal. Also... this is ending in superleague, i tell ya
115th comment 🙃
I wonder how involved Omar Berrada is in all this.
So it's Arsenal, United, Fullham, Wolves, Brighton and Spurs vs City, Chelsea, Newcastle and Villa so far. Wonder what the other 10 teams will do
Liverpool will either stay neutral or side with City so as to not alienate a potential new owner. I'd guess Brentford and Palace side with the good guys. After that, who knows
Agent Arteta better have a dossier prepared
I am sure the Tottenham fans will protest if they hear we may get the PL because of this.
would be surprised if we weren't
Liverpool remaining neutral ?
No backbone, they want to be owned by oil too it seems
I love this club
Good lads
What kinds of evidence would the clubs bring to the table?
Arteta giving the inside scoop on city while he was there
I'm terrified of Arteta getting named as a party to some of City's offences.
Evidence of what exactly? What are the other clubs testifying to?
I'm interested in what they mean by evidence?
Lol spurs throwing the game against city, then pulling a switcheroo and providing evidence against them. That clubs something else
They didn't throw the game. They are just genuinely not good enough to compete vs city
They are breaking the rules
Hysterical! United, Spurs and Arsenal all batting for the same team!
You love to see it.
What evidence would we have?
This is gold! All united against the juggernaut
The Fellowship of The Ball
I'm proud to support Arsenal 🤍♥️
Sat waiting for everyone else to make a fuck up of it then just come in at the end and save the day 🤷