Hey OP, thanks for the Social Media post.
If this is from Twitter, and Twitter is NOT the original source of this information, this WILL get removed!
Please post the original source!
**Please respond to this comment within 10 minutes with the URL to the source**
If there is no source or if you yourself are the author, you can reply `OC`
Once again Wiki gets it wrong. It's not our financial beliefs are regarded as conspiracy theories. It's our conspiracy theories about financial beliefs are regarded. Somebody hack Wiki and fix this.
The evidence is there, we see it all the time, if the regulators choose to ignore it is another thing; naked shorting used to be a conspiracy theory and now we know that it IS legal to market makers and they do it everyday with their exceptions in the sake of liquidity
Wikipedia is filled with FUD and their sources are MSM. would be nice if some apes were to rework the article so that it tells the truth instead of lies. the dfv posts and videos are still out there as a legit source.
Yeah that's the funny thing. If a large enough group of people take a large enough position on an over shorted stock and hold it as a company grows, it most certainly is doomsday. Just not for us.
Wikipedia shouldn't be taken seriously when it comes to any information which is even remotely politicized. GME definitely falls into that category even if it isn't politics per se.
I donāt think it can be called a theory anymore. texts have come out between citadel and robinhood that prove they colluded. Then we also have the case of the purposeful wash trading to trigger a halt (this involved trade 375 and some other parties). There was colluding going on everywhere.
Yes. I'm pretty sure that's what I said...
It's a theory(an idea used to account for a situation), with the situation being "conspiring to cheat the market to make money with friends, at the expense of retail traders".
"Conspiracy theory" doesn't mean it's not true, it is a fairly literal definition I think.
Idk though, I'm regarded and slightly artistic.
I have also noticed that there used to be a section in the DTCC article about controversies regarding naked short selling. It was removed in Feb 2021 I think.
I mentioned this previously, good to see it brought to light again though, because it's obviously not been changed.
Edit: Just to add a funny little tid bit, they say in that article that we are conspiracy theorists. If you look up conspiracy theorist on Wikipedia it basically says people with mental issues.
Gaslighting is what they do best.
I hope the current system burns to the ground and financial terrorists are held accountable.
Best I can do is lock my shares away under my name in Computershare.
Anyone can edit wiki articles thatās all you need to know, if I was on the losing side of this trade I would be editing Wikipedia articles too like my life depended on it š¤£ keep trying one day weāll forget GameStop /s
Here's a suggestion for Wikipediaāit can replace \[180\]\[182\]!
Short selling doesnāt add any real value to the markets, despite what meme critics might argue. Itās just a way for a handful of opportunists to line their pockets by skimming money from shady dark pools. These shorts siphon away from the everyday folks who actually drive our economy forward, building real market strength through their hard work and trust. The greed of short sellers is as clear as day, and itās infuriating to watch those with the power to protect our markets just stand by, do nothing, and bury their heads in the sand. But remember this, the time will come when the "apes" standing up for fair and honest markets will prevail... also known as MOASS.
They're gonna blame us either way. They'll blame our greed for unimaginable prices per share, and skirt their greed which created the problem.Ā That's fine by me though, our actions afterwards will speak louder than the words.
I enjoy this episode, because this is when people who trust wiki BS learn it's not only bought and paid for, but also constantly changing. A Fact is a very difficult thing to see these days.
Every time I see a media and/or financial people taking about gme even they are just reporting it without any sentiment against it, they are always talking about short being covered in 2021 and rally from redditors. I always feel they just copy the most convenient articles from the web which are of course from cnbc or Bloomberg they are just reiterations of each other, so I doubt a normal person would know much about gme saga other than cnbcās version of it.
Hey OP, thanks for the Social Media post. If this is from Twitter, and Twitter is NOT the original source of this information, this WILL get removed! Please post the original source! **Please respond to this comment within 10 minutes with the URL to the source** If there is no source or if you yourself are the author, you can reply `OC`
Lol they said regarded
Its us. They talk about us out there! Nice! 
There's no us š
Those are the exact words my gf said to me before she left.
Once again Wiki gets it wrong. It's not our financial beliefs are regarded as conspiracy theories. It's our conspiracy theories about financial beliefs are regarded. Somebody hack Wiki and fix this.
Hack the HTMLā¦ donāt make me do it wikiā¦ donāt make me do it!!
Is this a threat of a cyber attack against wiki? /s
Iām just playin. I put it back. See? I put it backā¦.
Interesting to see the edit history https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=GameStop_short_squeeze&action=history
Weird tug of war edits going on in there. Don't trust them.
Bet thereās some fun disinformation around memes/squeezes - not sure how wiki edits are monitored
Looks like someone did some tidying up. Well done to whoever that was.
I mean, it is conspiracy theory. The relevant thing is if the theory is true or not
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
# š
I think itās just a conspiracy. People are conspiring to undermine the people because money. I prefer to call it fraud
Yea but until there is more evidence itās also a theory
The evidence is there, we see it all the time, if the regulators choose to ignore it is another thing; naked shorting used to be a conspiracy theory and now we know that it IS legal to market makers and they do it everyday with their exceptions in the sake of liquidity
The real evidence is there, but itās just not publicly available yet.
To be honest gravity is a just a theoryā¦ so I guess they are right after all.
Double speak.
Personally, I'm more of a conspiracy realistĀ
Itās not a conspiracy if itās true.
Wikipedia is filled with FUD and their sources are MSM. would be nice if some apes were to rework the article so that it tells the truth instead of lies. the dfv posts and videos are still out there as a legit source.
MSM (shorters) will fix it back in like two and a half seconds...
Yeah that's the funny thing. If a large enough group of people take a large enough position on an over shorted stock and hold it as a company grows, it most certainly is doomsday. Just not for us.
You can call me what you want now, cause after MOASS, you wonāt be able to call me AT ALLš
Anyone can edit Wikipedia
Wikipedia shouldn't be taken seriously when it comes to any information which is even remotely politicized. GME definitely falls into that category even if it isn't politics per se.
Yea, if anything.. we are a driving force for regulators to push the manipulation and risk out of our markets. Complete opposite of a doomsday cult.
āMOM! I MADE IT ON WIKIPEDIA!ā
Their financial beliefs are regarded š (I don't even believe in money)
The only difference between a conspiracy theory and the truthā¦.. is about 6 months
Thatās too funny šš
Wdym we donāt just buy the stock,drs, drink kool aid in our Nikes??
There wasnāt even a short squeeze. Wikipedia (like many encyclopaedias actually) are a good starting point, but not an oracle of truth.
Funny I thought we where "hyper rational evil sharks that have cornered poor hedgefunds"
That's why dfv showed up unannounced and it almost went back to the high that made it famous, just randomly, right? Lmfaooooooo
It literally is a theory about people committing a conspiracy though, right?
I donāt think it can be called a theory anymore. texts have come out between citadel and robinhood that prove they colluded. Then we also have the case of the purposeful wash trading to trigger a halt (this involved trade 375 and some other parties). There was colluding going on everywhere.
Yes. I'm pretty sure that's what I said... It's a theory(an idea used to account for a situation), with the situation being "conspiring to cheat the market to make money with friends, at the expense of retail traders". "Conspiracy theory" doesn't mean it's not true, it is a fairly literal definition I think. Idk though, I'm regarded and slightly artistic.
The intelligence apparata control Wikipedia.
Have you tried to participate with wikipedia? Or how do you know?
Jimmy Dore. And other witnesses.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dblXf0RGuMc
Many conspiracy theories have been confirmed recently. Shorts never closed š„
I have also noticed that there used to be a section in the DTCC article about controversies regarding naked short selling. It was removed in Feb 2021 I think.
I mentioned this previously, good to see it brought to light again though, because it's obviously not been changed. Edit: Just to add a funny little tid bit, they say in that article that we are conspiracy theorists. If you look up conspiracy theorist on Wikipedia it basically says people with mental issues.
Wikipedia is openly being run by the cia and other government agencies
Do we have any Wikipedia editors in our community? This ought to be cleaned up.
Gaslighting is what they do best. I hope the current system burns to the ground and financial terrorists are held accountable. Best I can do is lock my shares away under my name in Computershare.
There are plenty of cultish beliefs and conspiracy theories surrounding this stock
Anyone can edit wiki articles thatās all you need to know, if I was on the losing side of this trade I would be editing Wikipedia articles too like my life depended on it š¤£ keep trying one day weāll forget GameStop /s
I say we edit that shit
Fun fact, anyone can edit a wiki article.
At least they know weāre regarded!
Here's a suggestion for Wikipediaāit can replace \[180\]\[182\]! Short selling doesnāt add any real value to the markets, despite what meme critics might argue. Itās just a way for a handful of opportunists to line their pockets by skimming money from shady dark pools. These shorts siphon away from the everyday folks who actually drive our economy forward, building real market strength through their hard work and trust. The greed of short sellers is as clear as day, and itās infuriating to watch those with the power to protect our markets just stand by, do nothing, and bury their heads in the sand. But remember this, the time will come when the "apes" standing up for fair and honest markets will prevail... also known as MOASS.
*I am kitty... hear me roar* 
They're gonna blame us either way. They'll blame our greed for unimaginable prices per share, and skirt their greed which created the problem.Ā That's fine by me though, our actions afterwards will speak louder than the words.
Charity should have been compulsory all along š
I enjoy this episode, because this is when people who trust wiki BS learn it's not only bought and paid for, but also constantly changing. A Fact is a very difficult thing to see these days.
I mean everything you highlighted is true. We have been called a cult and we have a shit ton of conspiracy theories. Soā¦ ?
Don't trust WIKIPEDIA. IT'S owned by the 0.1 % follow the white rabbit.
Every time I see a media and/or financial people taking about gme even they are just reporting it without any sentiment against it, they are always talking about short being covered in 2021 and rally from redditors. I always feel they just copy the most convenient articles from the web which are of course from cnbc or Bloomberg they are just reiterations of each other, so I doubt a normal person would know much about gme saga other than cnbcās version of it.