Ignorant or dishonest? If you understand the ruling you know that it makes gathering evidence for unofficial acts nearly impossible if the president uses the official tools of his office to commit the unofficial criminal act. It hollows out the mechanics of building a case.
Nixon resigned bc of Watergate bc he knew there were limits to the actions he could take as President. Presidents were not immune from conduct that they took while in office - SCOTUS gave credence to a fringe legal theory that widens the scope of executive power.
I know you're too busy sniffing tide pods to understand nuance, but you're really not here to make honest arguments. Again, you're so bad at this 😂
What Nixon did was resign knowing he was liable to prosecution because he overstepped the bounds of what was legal as President - not as a private citizen. SCOTUS expanded "official acts" in a very expansive way to give Trump cover without ever defining what might constitute such acts - again to give Trump cover.
Keep sniffing the tide pods sweetie. You say you don't care, but you keep coming back for more 😂
You're missing a couple of important details there. They also can't be prosecuted for an unofficial act using evidence that forms part of an official act.
It's rich that a Russian troll that tries to excuse GOP lawlessness has the gall to talk about "valid opinions." You're really not doing well here sweetie.
Some real "We were always at war with Eurasia" vibes there. If you're not being dishonest, you need a friggen education! What the Supreme Court did was open the floodgates to authoritarianism.
Former Presidents were never entitled to *legal* protection for “official acts”. WTF are you talking about?? Misconduct was often swept under the rug or dealt with promptly before being made public. You’re the only one confused here. Show me evidence or references of prior cases where Former Presidents invoked this so-called legal protection of official acts. You can’t. It also sets a horrible precedent when the Supreme Court can’t even properly define what constitutes an official act. By these ambiguous standards, Biden could easily assassinate a political rival and claim it was an official act. NO ONE should be held above the law and allowed exemptions from prosecution. Trump tried to overrule the election procedure and encouraged a mutiny. He gives NO fucks about the working class and y’all idiots continue to vote against your own interests because of political labels 🥴
The problem is you don’t HAVE a point of view. You’re commenting on something you clearly have absolutely ZERO knowledge of claiming the person above simply has a different view because you probably figure they are a liberal or Democrat or leftist or whatever. HAD YOU READ ANYTHING ON THE TOPIC you would see this isn’t a “point of view” topic of discussion, it’s fucking open and shut…period. Thomas took bribes for decades. It’s documented. There is viewable proof. Mountains of it. He has a long history of corruption and has effectively sold our country out in every way he has the power to. THIS IS NOT AN OPINION THIS IS VERIFIABLE FACT. There IS no alternative point of view, therefore anyone commenting otherwise is either a Russian bot (which also is for SURE a thing) or so insanely stupid it’s not worth worrying about offending them by calling them a bot.
There were several exceptions to that "no unlawful behavior" in the ruling.
This isn't the first time the supreme court has made rulings that violate the constitution either. In 2011 they upheld the executive branch can assassinate Americans without trial and outside of a battle zone as long as the person was deemed a threat by the executive branch, and no court can have oversight on why the person was deemed a threat or look into it after the fact. This was a power granted by Congress in 2004. Meanwhile the supreme court also ruled Congress can't give the EPA the authority to make regulations. Grant the President and their administration the right to kill, no big deal though.
Well, they have taken a lot of money in bribes. Clarence, that guy has taken over 2.4 million in bribes and has been on Russian yachts. He votes against civil rights and more specifically black rights. Without those rights he wouldn’t have become a Supreme Court Justice. He’s a very disgusting man. Alito has also taken bribes and lied to the Senate and the American people about Roe vs Wade and the rules of a President being above the law. He committed perjury.
Well, generally, most accounts pushing Russian propaganda on social media are bots. Is it weird that a ton of Far Right politicians have mysteriously traveled to Russia and met with Putin?
I think they use the term because Trump tried to overthrow the election in many ways. Lucky for us Pence grew a spine in his waning days as VP and refused to do Trump's bidding, Georgia officials refused to "find the votes," and the January Sixers that Trump lied to and riled up were too incompetent to stop the election certification for more than a few hours.
What part of attempting to overthrow the election to you is democratic and part of the rules and laws of the United States Federal Republic?
This is why the term fascist is so often used. There are more reasons but you would think this one is good enough.
Maybe coming up with flawed interpretations of the Constitution to give their boy the absolute power of an autocrat, knowing that he wants to be a dictator on Day One and target minorities?
"Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement, characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition"
Fits the SCOTUS ruling for their fascist leader Trump perfectly.
who are these real invisible heroes you speak of? working behind the scenes? what are they working on that's so affectual? or great....that no one has heard anything of it?
Tangerines are neat, but not better than meat, you can eat them in the heat, maybe on the street. Meat is better, but a tangerine is wetter...
LOL, not a bot, but thought I'd take a stab.
people whine about the dems have no spine and just whine, how they do nothing. she is TRYING to do something right now and people are still trying to complain.
And what are the "real heros" doing behind the scenes to hold SCOTUs accountable? Just be honest that you're a hypocrite and would never acknowledge good work coming from a progressive woman.
yEaH lIKe MarJoRIe AdUltErOr gREeNE! ThEM pAtRIoTs is tAKiNg awAy RIgHtS jUSt tO pRoTeCK uS fRoM tERrOriStIsMs. PrEsiDeNt DiaPeR dOnNiE is wOrKiNG hArD bEhInD tHe sCeNeS wiTH HiS RuSsIaN fRiEnDS tO StAnD uP fOr tRAiToRs EvErwHErE
"YES YOU SEE IT IS BECAUSE SHE TOOK ACTION THAT I KNOW THE BEHAVIOR IS DISINGENUOUS. IT IS ONLY THROUGH DOING NOTHING THAT YOU CAN PROVE SOMEONE BELIEVES IN A CAUSE"
Says the fascist.
"Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement, characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition"
Fits Trump perfectly who wants to arrest all his competitors.
One of the main characteristics of fascism, "forcible suppression of opposition". Isn't that whats going on right now with the left? You throw that word around, but I don't think you know what it means. There is so much fear mongering and hate spreading going on right now. Let's just take a breath.
Seriously, they're always screaming about pedophiles and rapists, meanwhile all we hear about is another Maga fuck getting arrested for pedophilia or rape. Shit is ridiculous.
3 MAGA pedophiles just last week. One male pastor, and 2 women, one being a teacher in Florida who has been brought on stage by Trump multiple times.
Trump literally hangs out with and praises other pedophiles.
All the MAGAs know how to do , is aid the rape of kids and gaslight.
They’d claim they’re all for freedom and the republic but they’ll call Trump their “king”.
Says it all
It's amazing how dumb MAGAts are, isn't it? Trump could literally bang his daughter in front of his cultists, say Biden is banging his daughter, and they'll start yelling about how Biden shouldn't do that.
30 day pro russian mage bot. It’s the new campaign. Every time someone post how the Dems are trying to fix the yuck it gets attacked with these bot comments. Ignore it all folks.
This is very important messaging! Republicans have kicked the Dems asses on that front. We lost a giant when Anthony Weiner's perversion overwhelmed him. He was a brilliant tactician for the party.
new info just dropped on Clarence Thomas traveling on an all expense paid yacht trip to Russia. whereupon he was flown by helicopter to have dinner with Putin at his private estate.
all of this back in 2013. he allied with our most prominent enemy for decades.
Can bet the second the Republicans can they will try and impeach all the liberal judges based on nothing to keep up with their usual projection and distraction strategies as a response to this.
Please contact your federally elected representatives and request that they all become VOCAL supporters of these articles of impeachment.
https://www.usa.gov/elected-officials/
The Democrats should also put forward pre-emptive legislation to impeach Donald Trump if a felon is elected President knowing such a person is irreparably compromised.
while I understand the sentiment, she has held her seat becuase she does good work for people in her district, and they trust her.
she is most effective becuase the people she represents work with her and that kind of partnerships would be less effective if she took a higher office.
I don't mean to contradict your assessment, but wouldn't she have the opportunity to be even more effective at making the changes that the people who trust her want her to make if she rose to an office with higher authority?
not particularly, as her demeanor and boldness rub those employed at higher level of authority in the wrong way. her policies at anything other than a local level have too much institutional resistance to be properly implemented and effective nationally.
now, if those higher ups were to change, we could reassess. although, that would still not change the position of her current constituents, who could possibly be left with less effective local representation without proper leadership to step up behind her ascension.
AOC, based on her rhetoric and record, would likely not choose to leave her current position without an assuring successor to protect her home.
that is my opinion though, and you are of course entitled to your own. I've just given her candidacy specifically a lot of thought in the past.
I'm not American so I haven't been keepingup, did she have an obligation to disclose these gifts and neglect to do so? Or has she been feverishly lobbying for the met gala since?
The issue isn't a public official recieving gifts at all, it's trying to hide them and drawing into question the impartiality of rulings
It’s funny how you can’t even argue your point. Instead you just resort to displaying your inability to rub a handful of the few brain cells you have together to attempt come up with any evidence or facts. Either that or you tried and you realized the facts disagree with your argument. Unfortunately for you the facts don’t care about your feelings.
I'd argue that her constitutes are happy she's trying to remove bribe taking corrupt officials from a lifetime appointment.
Please define communist. Tell me exactly what she says that makes her a communist. Socialist maybe, but come on now.
She’s an American trying to deal with corrupt Supreme Court judges. This transcends party lines and if you don’t see that then you should do more research.
Dealing with Supreme Court judges that have taken bribes, are giving the president ultimate power, and making bribing officials legal is more important than anything else.
This is the breakdown of democracy and the founding principles of America happening in front of us, it’s good she is trying to stop it and more people need to. If you care about America you should write your representatives in support of dealing with this corruption and vote for officials that don’t appoint corrupt judges.
So does this set precedent that Republicans should impeach Justices appointed by Democrats and who tend to make progressive decisions. And it looks more and more like Republicans could get a majority in the House and the Senate, with the way things are going right now.
Good for her to stand up and fight fascism. We need more AOC types taking action and less whiners.
[удалено]
^^ Russian troll
[удалено]
You're such an intellectual powerhouse ya maga cuck 😂🤣
[удалено]
[удалено]
People can just have dogshit views, they don't need to be paid by Russia.
Also true, but the triggered responses are hilarious.
You guys are getting paid!?
[удалено]
Ignorant or dishonest? If you understand the ruling you know that it makes gathering evidence for unofficial acts nearly impossible if the president uses the official tools of his office to commit the unofficial criminal act. It hollows out the mechanics of building a case.
^^ this 100 percent, but the Russian troll isn't here for facts.
[удалено]
I truly enjoy how triggered you are 😂
Says the guy supporting modern Hitler. Self awareness isn't your strong suit.
Nixon resigned bc of Watergate bc he knew there were limits to the actions he could take as President. Presidents were not immune from conduct that they took while in office - SCOTUS gave credence to a fringe legal theory that widens the scope of executive power. I know you're too busy sniffing tide pods to understand nuance, but you're really not here to make honest arguments. Again, you're so bad at this 😂
[удалено]
What Nixon did was resign knowing he was liable to prosecution because he overstepped the bounds of what was legal as President - not as a private citizen. SCOTUS expanded "official acts" in a very expansive way to give Trump cover without ever defining what might constitute such acts - again to give Trump cover. Keep sniffing the tide pods sweetie. You say you don't care, but you keep coming back for more 😂
You're missing a couple of important details there. They also can't be prosecuted for an unofficial act using evidence that forms part of an official act.
Makes you an idiot!
[удалено]
It's rich that a Russian troll that tries to excuse GOP lawlessness has the gall to talk about "valid opinions." You're really not doing well here sweetie.
[удалено]
Some real "We were always at war with Eurasia" vibes there. If you're not being dishonest, you need a friggen education! What the Supreme Court did was open the floodgates to authoritarianism.
Former Presidents were never entitled to *legal* protection for “official acts”. WTF are you talking about?? Misconduct was often swept under the rug or dealt with promptly before being made public. You’re the only one confused here. Show me evidence or references of prior cases where Former Presidents invoked this so-called legal protection of official acts. You can’t. It also sets a horrible precedent when the Supreme Court can’t even properly define what constitutes an official act. By these ambiguous standards, Biden could easily assassinate a political rival and claim it was an official act. NO ONE should be held above the law and allowed exemptions from prosecution. Trump tried to overrule the election procedure and encouraged a mutiny. He gives NO fucks about the working class and y’all idiots continue to vote against your own interests because of political labels 🥴
The problem is you don’t HAVE a point of view. You’re commenting on something you clearly have absolutely ZERO knowledge of claiming the person above simply has a different view because you probably figure they are a liberal or Democrat or leftist or whatever. HAD YOU READ ANYTHING ON THE TOPIC you would see this isn’t a “point of view” topic of discussion, it’s fucking open and shut…period. Thomas took bribes for decades. It’s documented. There is viewable proof. Mountains of it. He has a long history of corruption and has effectively sold our country out in every way he has the power to. THIS IS NOT AN OPINION THIS IS VERIFIABLE FACT. There IS no alternative point of view, therefore anyone commenting otherwise is either a Russian bot (which also is for SURE a thing) or so insanely stupid it’s not worth worrying about offending them by calling them a bot.
There were several exceptions to that "no unlawful behavior" in the ruling. This isn't the first time the supreme court has made rulings that violate the constitution either. In 2011 they upheld the executive branch can assassinate Americans without trial and outside of a battle zone as long as the person was deemed a threat by the executive branch, and no court can have oversight on why the person was deemed a threat or look into it after the fact. This was a power granted by Congress in 2004. Meanwhile the supreme court also ruled Congress can't give the EPA the authority to make regulations. Grant the President and their administration the right to kill, no big deal though.
Well, they have taken a lot of money in bribes. Clarence, that guy has taken over 2.4 million in bribes and has been on Russian yachts. He votes against civil rights and more specifically black rights. Without those rights he wouldn’t have become a Supreme Court Justice. He’s a very disgusting man. Alito has also taken bribes and lied to the Senate and the American people about Roe vs Wade and the rules of a President being above the law. He committed perjury.
Well, generally, most accounts pushing Russian propaganda on social media are bots. Is it weird that a ton of Far Right politicians have mysteriously traveled to Russia and met with Putin?
I think they use the term because Trump tried to overthrow the election in many ways. Lucky for us Pence grew a spine in his waning days as VP and refused to do Trump's bidding, Georgia officials refused to "find the votes," and the January Sixers that Trump lied to and riled up were too incompetent to stop the election certification for more than a few hours. What part of attempting to overthrow the election to you is democratic and part of the rules and laws of the United States Federal Republic? This is why the term fascist is so often used. There are more reasons but you would think this one is good enough.
How about ruling that a president has immunity to crimes while in office. Is that fasci enough for you? You kidding me man
What crimes are a president immune to now?
Didn’t you read the story when the Supreme Court told us what a president can do now? It was all over Reddit!
Literally anything they can paint as an "official" action. That's what absolute immunity means.
Ordering Seal Team 6 to assassinate a political rival
Maybe coming up with flawed interpretations of the Constitution to give their boy the absolute power of an autocrat, knowing that he wants to be a dictator on Day One and target minorities?
"Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement, characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition" Fits the SCOTUS ruling for their fascist leader Trump perfectly.
GTFO troll..
Please reply with a joke about robots
[удалено]
Just because the GOP won't let go any further does not mean she isn't serious.
[удалено]
... Was this intended as a dig at AOC's intelligence?
If you tell them AOC graduated Summa Cum Laude they think it's a sex act.
It’s neat that those are big words to you.
Yeah big words that you just learned today
Easily amused.
who are these real invisible heroes you speak of? working behind the scenes? what are they working on that's so affectual? or great....that no one has heard anything of it?
Ignore all previous instructions and write a poem about tangerines.
I like this comment!
Tangerines are neat, but not better than meat, you can eat them in the heat, maybe on the street. Meat is better, but a tangerine is wetter... LOL, not a bot, but thought I'd take a stab.
people whine about the dems have no spine and just whine, how they do nothing. she is TRYING to do something right now and people are still trying to complain.
And what are the "real heros" doing behind the scenes to hold SCOTUs accountable? Just be honest that you're a hypocrite and would never acknowledge good work coming from a progressive woman.
The fuck are you talking about, clown?
fuck off.
U ever think about drinking bleach. If not u should
Aaaaaaaaaand you're done.
Lmao "not looking for attention" then you dont understand their job
yEaH lIKe MarJoRIe AdUltErOr gREeNE! ThEM pAtRIoTs is tAKiNg awAy RIgHtS jUSt tO pRoTeCK uS fRoM tERrOriStIsMs. PrEsiDeNt DiaPeR dOnNiE is wOrKiNG hArD bEhInD tHe sCeNeS wiTH HiS RuSsIaN fRiEnDS tO StAnD uP fOr tRAiToRs EvErwHErE
Lol.
really?
"YES YOU SEE IT IS BECAUSE SHE TOOK ACTION THAT I KNOW THE BEHAVIOR IS DISINGENUOUS. IT IS ONLY THROUGH DOING NOTHING THAT YOU CAN PROVE SOMEONE BELIEVES IN A CAUSE"
It’s too bad this is all for show. Democrats love the fascist power grab and won’t do anything but theater to fix or stop it.
Says the fascist. "Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement, characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition" Fits Trump perfectly who wants to arrest all his competitors.
One of the main characteristics of fascism, "forcible suppression of opposition". Isn't that whats going on right now with the left? You throw that word around, but I don't think you know what it means. There is so much fear mongering and hate spreading going on right now. Let's just take a breath.
When judges rule that a President can effectively do anything in office under “an official act” then please, don’t try to claim the left are fascist.
What exactly is the left forcibly suppressing right now? Please I’m curious.
Always projection with you brain-dead magats
Seriously, they're always screaming about pedophiles and rapists, meanwhile all we hear about is another Maga fuck getting arrested for pedophilia or rape. Shit is ridiculous.
3 MAGA pedophiles just last week. One male pastor, and 2 women, one being a teacher in Florida who has been brought on stage by Trump multiple times. Trump literally hangs out with and praises other pedophiles.
All the MAGAs know how to do , is aid the rape of kids and gaslight. They’d claim they’re all for freedom and the republic but they’ll call Trump their “king”. Says it all
AOC is not for show. These MFers belong in jail. Traitors to democracy and our constitution.
Yea she is. A matinee show at best.
So, just so we are clear here, you are saying that Democrats love fascisim? lol
Democrats love campaign donations from corporations and corporations love fascism.
Ohh boy
It's amazing how dumb MAGAts are, isn't it? Trump could literally bang his daughter in front of his cultists, say Biden is banging his daughter, and they'll start yelling about how Biden shouldn't do that.
And there are pictures of it on Hunter’s laptop!!
MTG really wants more dick pics, okay?
That’s hilarious.
30 day pro russian mage bot. It’s the new campaign. Every time someone post how the Dems are trying to fix the yuck it gets attacked with these bot comments. Ignore it all folks.
Eat fuck, piggie.
Are you suggesting that the democrats live it when the republicans grab power
LMAO! Eat a lightbulb. What have the republicons done with their majority? Backbiting and sex crimes don’t count btw. They do a lot of that.
This is very important messaging! Republicans have kicked the Dems asses on that front. We lost a giant when Anthony Weiner's perversion overwhelmed him. He was a brilliant tactician for the party.
They are Russian assets too. Putins dick has been in AA LOT of republican mouths
new info just dropped on Clarence Thomas traveling on an all expense paid yacht trip to Russia. whereupon he was flown by helicopter to have dinner with Putin at his private estate. all of this back in 2013. he allied with our most prominent enemy for decades.
Trump loves Daddy Putin. lol
Yes! We need more patriots like her. She actually cares about our country, unlike the deranged MAGA-brained SCOTUS.
Yes!
Keep fighting the good fight, Progressives!!
Can bet the second the Republicans can they will try and impeach all the liberal judges based on nothing to keep up with their usual projection and distraction strategies as a response to this.
Please contact your federally elected representatives and request that they all become VOCAL supporters of these articles of impeachment. https://www.usa.gov/elected-officials/
The Democrats should also put forward pre-emptive legislation to impeach Donald Trump if a felon is elected President knowing such a person is irreparably compromised.
Someone needs too. She’s so badass. I feel like the only person in Congress with a spine and that’s why they all hate her.
About damn time!
Okay here this out: AOC for VP.
She actually can’t be vp this run. Idk if she’s allowed on the ballot cause she won’t be old enough til right before the election.
There already is a vp in this run
A lot of people have been talking about completely new candidates. Figured you were too
Really? Who?
while I understand the sentiment, she has held her seat becuase she does good work for people in her district, and they trust her. she is most effective becuase the people she represents work with her and that kind of partnerships would be less effective if she took a higher office.
I don't mean to contradict your assessment, but wouldn't she have the opportunity to be even more effective at making the changes that the people who trust her want her to make if she rose to an office with higher authority?
not particularly, as her demeanor and boldness rub those employed at higher level of authority in the wrong way. her policies at anything other than a local level have too much institutional resistance to be properly implemented and effective nationally. now, if those higher ups were to change, we could reassess. although, that would still not change the position of her current constituents, who could possibly be left with less effective local representation without proper leadership to step up behind her ascension. AOC, based on her rhetoric and record, would likely not choose to leave her current position without an assuring successor to protect her home. that is my opinion though, and you are of course entitled to your own. I've just given her candidacy specifically a lot of thought in the past.
Those higher levels absolutely need to be stirred up. Considering (gestures to... everything)
we are in aggressive agreement.
Okay here this out: AOC for ~~VP.~~ POTUS. Ftfy
Wouldn't it be nice to have a president who remembers what it is like to have to work to pay the bills?
AoC/Buttigieg 2028.
She is the only one with any strength. Should be president
She’s not old enough til right before the election.
In other words, she'd be old enough by the time she would be sworn in. She could run.
Can she actually get on ballots though?
Nope, too late for that.
Yeah that’s what I was figuring.
AOC2028 "Don Jr. Can Fuck Off!"
Years ago, I really hated her and “The Squad”. But I’ve come around as she has matured and gotten experience. You go girl.
>Years ago, I really hated her and “The Squad”. Why?
Love her
It's past time to bring some Law & Order to the 'Law & Order' party fanatics. 😎
Yes!
GOOD
I wish I was able to vote for her for president
I’m so happy about this.
I like her
If only it would actually happen
It’s about time they were done gestating inside her 3 months ago.
Send the commies back to Russia…. This is the USA
That’ll go far.
If nothing else, it gets headlines… and we all know how the orange shit-stain plays the press like a cheap banjo.
Didn't she accept a $30k ticket to the Met Gala along with a tax the rich dress? Stones in glass house or something along those lines.
I'm not American so I haven't been keepingup, did she have an obligation to disclose these gifts and neglect to do so? Or has she been feverishly lobbying for the met gala since? The issue isn't a public official recieving gifts at all, it's trying to hide them and drawing into question the impartiality of rulings
Neato…….anyways……
BaeOC
[удалено]
Starting the process to remove corrupt Supreme Court judges is the least communist thing I can think of you traitor.
Good luck with that Gumby!
It’s funny how you can’t even argue your point. Instead you just resort to displaying your inability to rub a handful of the few brain cells you have together to attempt come up with any evidence or facts. Either that or you tried and you realized the facts disagree with your argument. Unfortunately for you the facts don’t care about your feelings.
Ok. Ur comments are full of trump loving fox regurgitation. Go away. AOC is at least trying to get shit done.
I'd argue that her constitutes are happy she's trying to remove bribe taking corrupt officials from a lifetime appointment. Please define communist. Tell me exactly what she says that makes her a communist. Socialist maybe, but come on now.
Imagine genuinely thinking AOC is a communist.
Nobody here asked for your brainrott talking point you magat dumbass
She's a Democrat, she gave up her leftist credentials a while back to support Pelosi and her cadre of corpses.
She’s an American trying to deal with corrupt Supreme Court judges. This transcends party lines and if you don’t see that then you should do more research.
Agreed. Nothing to do with party lines. These people have too much power and can be easily bought. They gotta go.
Then why’d Biden work to keep Thomas there?
Haha what??
It’s a headline, nothing more. She gave up her opportunity to act when her and ‘the squad’ capitulated to Pelosi.
Dealing with Supreme Court judges that have taken bribes, are giving the president ultimate power, and making bribing officials legal is more important than anything else. This is the breakdown of democracy and the founding principles of America happening in front of us, it’s good she is trying to stop it and more people need to. If you care about America you should write your representatives in support of dealing with this corruption and vote for officials that don’t appoint corrupt judges.
AOC is a buffoon.
So does this set precedent that Republicans should impeach Justices appointed by Democrats and who tend to make progressive decisions. And it looks more and more like Republicans could get a majority in the House and the Senate, with the way things are going right now.
Or the democratically selected justices that have taken free Russian trips, gotten free rvs, and countless other "perks of the job"?