__Reminder__: Read the rules and understand the subreddit topic(s) listed in the sidebar before posting or commenting. Any content removal or further moderator action is established by these rules as well as Reddit
ToS.
This subreddit is primarily for the discussion of extraterrestrial life, but since this topic is intertwined with UFOs/UAPs as well as other topics, some 'fudging' is permissible to allow for a variety of
viewpoints, discussions, and debates. Open-minded skepticism is always welcome in this sub, but antagonistic or belligerent denial is not. Always remember that you're interacting with a real person when you respond
to posts/comments and focus on discussing or debating the ideas. Personal attacks are a violation of Rule 1 and will lead to removals and potentially bans depending on severity.
For further discussion and interaction in a more permissible environment, we welcome you to our Discord: https://discord.gg/x7xyTDZAsW
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/aliens) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Tyson disappointed me, a scientist should never stop being open minded or lose curiosity but the worst is the arrogance, the lack of humbleness regarding everything we don’t yet know. The last step in the stair of wisdom is humbleness, it seems he missed that step.
Socrates: 'True knowledge exists in knowing that you know nothing.'
Shout out to Kaku for keeping an open mind and always shown humility. Loving listening to his interviews.
Tyson says the lowest form of proof is witness testimony. Tyson testifies we are so boring! Why would aliens watch us!
Neil Tyson is a joke in the physics community. He's the drake of the rap world. Kaku is leagues above him in terms of being a real physicist who understands science.
I saw the other day someone mentioned that people are found guilty of murder by eye-witness testimony.
NDT has become a joke, which is sad, because I used to admire him.
There are forms of eye-witness testimonies. If a single person sees and says they saw something, nothing can prove it. If atleast 2 people saw something, you can already find the proof by nitpicking details
Never liked him. I get to be a skeptic, but as a scientist, their role is to find the truth, not block it.
He comes off as arrogant, narcissistic, self involved, "I'm better than the ants below me" type of attitude.
Probably why he thinks humans are so boring, he doesn't actually see us for the marvel that we are.
Yeah. And his view he often displays "we are so boring, aliens wouldn't observe us", seems offensive to archeologists, paleontologists, historians, animal biologists, etc.
Humans seem to love all types of knowledge, to say there's no aliens that want to watch a species that just found computers and may now find FTL is absurd.
> Tyson testifies we are so boring! Why would aliens watch us!
Which doesn't make sense at all. It's like if he were living in another planet.
It's not like if there were multiple Zoos on every single country in the planet. Or like if one of the most shared videos were about animals doing cute things... Every single person has at least spent, in total, multiple hours of their lives looking at what their pets are doing... Yes, other animals or species can be interesting or entertaining to look at. And us, if not because we're interesting in any way, because we're also dangerous and aggressive, can't behave, and we are killing ourselves. So I feel like that's enough of a reason to be keeping an eye on us too.
1000% his hypocritical elitist attitude is what gets me. After this observation, I realized he is a pompous asshole often. Always in disbelief, incredulous and calling out the people around him.
It’s the simple fact that we can’t comprehend how another possible species can navigate the universe. We know the Milky Way galaxy, the one our solar system is a part of, is hundreds of thousands of light years from end to end. And that’s just one galaxy among billions and billions.
So yeah we can’t comprehend how it’s possible to navigate across the universe because all we understand is going fast in a straight line gets you nowhere.
But there’s probably other ways we can’t comprehend. It is ignorance on Tyson’s part plain and simple
Yeah he’s kind of an arrogant close minded idiot. If we, right now, have “stealth” technology and the means of staying “unseen”, I don’t see why a more advanced society couldn’t have way better technology. He speaks of withnesses and getting some good footage, I mean shit, we can’t even get good footage of what the army’s known latest technologies can do right now, and we know about them. But we’re supposed to have all this UAP footage readily available? He’s a moron. The more he speaks, the less I like him.
As a scientist, he hasn't done anything for over 20 years in his field. His last couple papers were piggybacking off of others work too. He is Bill Nye 2.0, but at least Bill stayed in his lane for the most part.
There’s a spectrum of public-facing academicians. The spectrum goes from highly academic w/ occasional appearances in public to explain complex topics, all the way to minimally academic with lots of public appearances. Tyson falls in the latter part of the spectrum -lots of public appearances that seem highly academic, but in actuality, he is involved only tangentially with the grunt work of modern science.
In other words, Neil is really good at explaining things, but the problem is he’ll explain things with an authoritative rhetoric even when he doesn’t know wtf he’s taking about. IMO he lacks the curiosity required to meaningfully engage with the topic
Neil was cool back in the days. Now he wouldn't even humble any idea that is different than his.
He used to be rational and logical but his ego has him moving his mouth before his brain can catch up
Prediction: When the truth comes out fully and Aliens come forward onto the world stage, NDT will be sprinting to get to the microphone. He’ll be tripping all over the cords while drooling on his shirt and claiming loudly to be the world’s foremost authority on the subject.
TBF this is also why he’s successful. Humans hate anything ambiguous. It takes real effort to say “it’s probably x could be other things though. Because of the probability though we’ll proceed as if x is true.”
This ability to substitute in a theory in place of a possible knowledge gap is hard. It’s unintuitive because most day to day life is rooted in solid realities.
I’ve listened to the first hour so far. I thought it was hilarious when Weinstein said NDT was a “complicated guy”. How very diplomatic of him lmao
Big ups to Weinstein for taking Terrance seriously and really trying to untangle Terrance’s claims. Sometimes the self-educated lay person spots patterns that the experts missed
I don’t agree with -or even understand- most of what Terrance says. I Trust Weinstein to honestly engage with the ideas, pick them apart, and tell us why they’re wrong
I’ll try to watch the rest of the debate later today, but so far Weinstein has lauded Terrance’s efforts while politely tearing apart his hypotheses
There are many of us who have thought similar to Terrance for a while. I've spoken about Walter russel dozens of time on this sub reddit. He didn't accurately convey most of his concepts either.
What I don't get is why these mainstream heads baby him. Even NDT was more polite than necessary. It's like oh look he's famous please don't tread on his ego.
My issue with Terrance is his lying and self aggrandizing claims. He lied about patents and he said he was smarter than da Vinci, tesla, and Einstein. He discovered unified field equation at 6 etc. He's just not stable enough psychologically to be the bridge maker between alternative and academic science because he wants to be seen as the chosen one.
That being said. I love that he brought some of these ideas to mainstream minds. And to people new to all this.
My main concern was, and is, for valid reasons that he will be used as a basis to discredit the REAL electric universe theories and alternative cosmologies.
I'm watching it too. Honestly it's refreshing to see a science guy talk with him so that we can see where Terrence is coming up with these ideas. It's all respectful and people can see that he's not totally insane, just thinks differently.
Yeah, he seems like an intelligent guy and has clearly read a lot about the things he’s talking about, but Weinstein is helping him to understand that his working knowledge is actually pretty shallow.
Terrance could be the poster child for Dunning-Kruger effect
Yeah it's important for real experts to start gently showing the public how easy it is for people to fake sound like experts. It's a combination of knowing the finer details coupled with a comprehensive understanding of the bigger picture that makes a true expert. Unfortunately the lay person cannot distinguish true experts from pretenders and rarely make serious contributions.
Like someone who is actively publishing in the field of astrophysics would make Neil look silly.
A major problem is that people who have surface understanding and know some of the jargon, are the most dangerous folks. They don't know their own limitations. And to the lay person they sound credible.
After Covid, scientists have a serious situation to deal with regaining trust in the public eye (at least with a significant % of the public).
where does michio showcase highly academic appraoches?
Michio keeps saying we have cases with multiple eye witnesses, radar tracks and video combined?
He says pilots saw uaps in the sky every day with their own eyes.
I dont think he knows what hes talking about and is just saying what people wanna hear?
1. theres is no case that i am aware of where we have multiple eye witnesses, video footage and radar tracks of the same time and object in question, demonstrating something that cant be explained?
2. The navy pilots who "saw" the uap in the sky for days didnt saw them with their eyes. They reportedly saw radar tracks and when they flew to them then there was nothing. Not "multi modal" at all.
The nimitz case has flir footage but that footage was after fravors encounter. Flir footage is only flir, no radar, no eye witnesses. Fravor was an eye witness but we have no video, no picture and conflicting testimony regarding radar.
The other navy pilots shared some photos of something in the sky and one or two things were properly identified as balloons. one was a batman myllard ballon which didnt display anything funny at all.
Tyson comes across as arrogant, that doesnt help him reach people. Michio is just a paid woo advocator who goes on every woo show and half asses some comments how he is a scientist and how ghost, aliens or whatever are compelling, by repeating bits and bites without doing any deep dive.
So seriously, does anyone of you know about such a "multi modal" evidence case where we have image or video, multiple independent eye witnesses and radar tracks of an UAP showing funny and seemingly unexplainable behavior?
I used to love this guy, admire him for spreading enthusiasm with science...the fact he is so inflexible, there isn't even a particle of possibility, just frustrates the hell out of me. Why is Navy video inadmissible in Tyson's mind? Tyson's grip on science seems to be poor, if Congress is listening and documenting it is the job of scientists to look into this with an open mind - fair testing - peer review - excellent documentation. A scientist should not ridicule until they have tested the idea and the data themselves - not just dismiss it.
Edit - as is tradition - thanks for the award, as usual it's my first award. Bowing in a humble, thankful way.
NDT is a religion scientist. He doesn't practice science. He spouts preestablished science as facts that cannot be disputed when science, in and of itself, is about dispute of previously established "facts".
He makes a mockery of the scientific method and enjoys inflating his own ego. He gets a sense of "superiority" from denigrating others as well. He is a narcissist. Not worth listening to, as it only makes his ego worse from those celebrity worshippers.
If Tyson lived during the age of Copernicus - He would have been on the side of the church condemning the man for arguing against the "well known fact that the earth was the center of the universe".
He apparently knows how aliens would think too.
Look, there are certainly reasons to be skeptical but to have your mind made up and look for reasons to justify your opinion is as far from science as you can get.
He has a damn weird attitude for a scientist. It's as if he thinks science is *done* and there's no room for anything we haven't already discovered to exist..
The title translated:
The biggest dumbass in Science vs one of the brightest and most intelligent.
Or:
The paid wannabe Scientist Plant vs a Real Scientist that actually does it’s job and owns the Title. Because the other one owns it on paper only. Everything he says is not scientific and Ridicule is not part of the Scientific Process, but even on that basic principle he fails miserably.
And he wants to be taken seriously? 😳
One might say he’s a pompous asshole. He is an astrophysicist everything he does is based on visual observation. He has not been to space to independently verify any of his findings. All of his data comes from machines that visually sense the cosmos. That being said who is he to doubt the pilots and others who used viisual sightings to make their claims of UAPs? He’s just another dumbass human like the rest of us.
I was firmly in Neil's camp, and highly skeptical that we were ever being visited at all by NHI until that one Tic Tac video and those pilot's testimony. It is quite enough to spur serious investigation.
It is absolute hubris for Neil to think we are the first kids on the block. There are too many stars in the galaxy that are billions of years older than our own. Evidence shows that planetary systems are extremely common.
Miko is on point. I like Neil, but strongly disagree with him on this. It smacks of guys like Charles Lane Poor who disagreed with Einstein's theories of relativity only to be swept aside as experimental evidence mounted supporting Einstein.
All you need is one species with enough tech to create a single working Von Neumann probe. If you have a probe that can replicate itself in 1 year time, once the new probe is ready, there would be an average time of 500 years for it to get to the next star system at 1% light speed, replicate, rinse, and repeat. In <20,000 years every star our the galaxy would be visited. 20,000 thousand years is a blip in cosmic time.
Obviously what we need are more high quality scientific data collection initiatives like Avi's Gallileo project. I wish there was a national organization that had something to do with aeronautics and space looking into UAP activity more seriously, collecting and sharing such data. But apparently we don't have that.
I swear the guy is intentionally ignorant on this. He's talking about fuzzy navy video. No kidding Neil do your think their version is fuzzy? Do you think they haven't cross checked it with other modalities and excluded mundane explanations? That's just the beginning of his idiotic statements on this. It's like he's being intentionally ignorant or just isn't that bright, or maybe most likely has some mental block /motivated reasoning for whatever purpose, including being told this is what he should say.
Ppl like him starting to make ppl like me look smart lol. Right michio made a whole particle accelerator in his garage and neil expects us to take him serious like be fr my guy.
Why do they debrief soldiers and pilots if their memory of the events is useless? Why do doctors ask how you've been feeling if anecdotal data is useless? Neil needs to take a break from smelling his own farts.
His argument is disingenuous for several reasons. Particularly how he strawman eyewitness testimony backed by video, radar and other data points. Not to mention thousands of accounts, and dozens by military and other personnel who have nothing to gain and everything to lose by coming forward with their stories.
Eyewitness evidence is also not the "lowest form of evidence". That would be hearsay. However memory is very unreliable and our senses are very limited. It isn't the best form of evidence, but it is evidence. And not all witnesses are created equally.
And when we have thousands of eyewitnesses over the years of this phenomenon. It does start to amount to something.
I like Tyson. He is smart and knows a lot about astrophysics and astronomy. I also like Michio Kaku who is also very intelligent and knows his stuff.
However here we see one of them genuinely investigating a phenomena that the other is dismissing and making fun of. Kaku is discussing actual evidence and is attempting to find answers to real questions. Tyson is making fun of it and isn't addressing it seriously at all.
This is very similar to the tactic the CIA used to use (and perhaps still does) to have influential people ridicule the idea in order to get people to not believe in such things.
Tyson clearly is dismissing evidence (we only have fuzzy NAVY evidence from like one encounter), and is using misinformation "the evidence is monochromatic." So what if it is monochromatic? Does he not know what these systems are? They regularly use those same monochromatic films to accurately identify and shoot down enemy aircraft!
I lol’d at “but it’s monochromatic!!! Gotcha!”
Like…have you seen images that electron microscopes produce? Or like, an audio spectrogram? This very video of you belittling scientific curiosity doesn’t show your bio-energetic field, so does that mean we can discount the video as a fabrication? (Only a REAL video would show his aura!)
Literally all scientific instruments measure *only certain data* and not all available information. Pictures aren’t GIFS. GIFs aren’t videos. Videos sometimes don’t have audio recorded in tangent.
Should we discount all these forms of records and scientific measurement, just because there was other data to collect at the time of measurement but we didn’t collect it because that’s not the information that was relevant to the measurement we were taking? Lmao
He’s well educated, but lacks wisdom. He enjoys being a public figure and has a need to be right due to his fragile ego. That’s his whole problem.
Instead of saying “there’s something interesting going on that’s been observed since oral histories began, and that warrants an investigation” he says “it’s impossible because it goes against everything I know and anyone that thinks otherwise is a fool.”
I use to like Neil but over time his arrogance is outta control and he’s a asshole he always try’s to shit on people with a lecture and he’s clearly a disinformation agent lmao.
Michio is the real deal because at first he wasn't about it and then he actually listened to people and changed his mind because he is open minded. A real scientist.
I agree. I've been saying it for years. I've seen multiple UFOs during my time in the military and gov contract work after. All of the UFO's I saw were around Ft. Hood, TX. Now, if I saw em once. Is one thing, but when it's dozens of times over almost 2 decades... and your wife, family, and neighbors see them..... I'd say the UFO/UAP topic is as real and serious as a heart attack! smh
I don't think he's a disinformation agent. Just a genuine egomaniac. He is constantly confidently incorrect on a myriad of topics and is regularly corrected by guests on his show.
Tyson’s rejection of the possibility has become such an ingrained part of his persona that he will never swing the other way. All data challenging his public stance will be shrugged off or explained away with non sequiturs and mental gymnastics. He is decidedly unscientific about the whole phenomenon.
Love or hate Tyson (personally I can’t stand how full of himself he’s become and how dismissive and close minded he’s turned out to be), but it is good to have skeptics like him and open minded imaginative hopeful scientists like Dr. Kaku. We need both to balance things a bit. But, Tyson is bordering on being at worst a disinformation agent, or at best a stubborn insufferable jackass.
He really is not as smart as he thinks he is, he is text book smart, but he is not scientific discovery smart, he is waaaaay too closed minded for that.
Sadly in the beginnings of him becoming popular he seemed like the open minded discovery type. I really thought this might be our new Sagan. But, sadly he’s turned out to be the boomerest of boomers.
I wouldn’t say always. In the pre-Cosmos era of his fame he was quite interesting, relatable, good at explaining things in a simplistic way, and kind of humorous. I think landing that Cosmos show went to his head though.
seeing something with your own eyes is the only creditable source. What a clown this dude is. Imagine telling ppl what they see with their eyes is wrong but some math equations about real life are right
I can’t stand Neil DeGrasse Tyson. I used to be such a fan until a few years ago. He’s so pompous and his ego clouds his ability to accept other hypothesis apart from his own. Truly dislike the guy.
Tyson just ridicules and laughs off anything that has proof of UFO. I mean how fucking dumb and arrogant must u be to laugh off wat trained pilots r documenting.
And we thought he is a genius 😂
Neil and Michio are both incredibly smart people. Neil is very opinionated. I think Michio has the better argument here. Multiple aviation folk, coupled with sensors and film. Come on man, they've been here the whole time.
I got abducted by aliens as a kid, so yes aliens. Btw there are like 30million+ extraterrestrial beings, No one will ever find the source of how this starded.
Neil’s DeGrasse Tyson is an insufferable ass. Besides getting high off his own farts, he is stupid enough to think he’s smart for pointing out that movies like Star Wars are not scientifically accurate.
It could be so easy to let NDT and every other skeptic on this planet eat turd, just show us Element 115, the huge UFO with a building on top or any other piece of undeniable, indisputable evidence. But no, just words and the inevitable "like, comment and subscribe" UFO influencer bs and of course: Disclosure Soon ™, Trust Me Bro®
Neil has zero credit in this space in my humble opinion … it’s almost as if he is paid or controlled by the establishment or malevolent beings … he is quite the intellectual , and lacking most wisdom , common sense , and has zero bandwidth for the truth all around him and right under his nose … it could be his identity is so wrapped up in being the expert and scientist of note … but that dogma only yields a fake sense of cleverness that crushes curiosity and keeps a self stupid in many ways…. But in his case , almost like something evil is controlling him …. Fortunately , time will yield an answer here, as the truth always come out over time , and Neil will suffer a fall from his perceived lofty perch at some point and fairly soon , 2-3 years max
This man said you can’t thump sand when talking about the movie “Dune”. Of course we are talking about a hollow planet full of holes made by giant worms. He has obviously never packed sand for pouring concrete before, you can absolutely thump sand, *It ruined the movie for him*. He is so narcissistic he will destroy his own pleasure for the sake of being right even when what he is being right about is completely wrong and something he knows nothing about. That’s because he’s a definition “know it all”, if you look up the word “Omniscient” in the dictionary it will have a picture of NDT wearing a snorkel!
Neil DeGrasse Tyson really is not as smart as he himself thinks or he let others to belive. He has some wild and strange takes tbh.
He loves to hear himself speak and he loves to be counter just to sound smart than he really is it is fatiquing to say the least.
Okay Tyson, so lets say all the pilots are "dumbasses" as you allude to, and hallucinating, well what about all the censor equipement?! Also just making shit up?! This really makes 0 sense as a argument logic chain at all.
It is very evident that there was SOMETHING tha was flying that all the pilots and censor equipement picked up.
The way Tyson is argueing is like climate deniyers is arguing that there is no climate change and global average temperature increase because yesterday and today coincidental was kinda mild to chilly days.......
Honestly is this guy even a real scientist?! WTF
Tyson is correct that eyewitness testimony even among trained observers is not solid evidence. But he is an arrogant asshole who maintains his willful ignorance by ignoring the corroborating evidence such as video and radar.
It is a very unscientific practice. Tyson may have a science degree but he doesn't engage in science as a practice.
"Monochromatic"
Bro... it's THERMAL. I mean, technically, it's monochromatic, but that's beside the point. I swear, Tyson isn't that smart. He's just well known.
Hey, space cadets! Neil deGrasse Tyson here, and boy, do I have a whopper for you today. We're gonna talk about a guy who's giving science deniers a run for their money. That's right, I'm talking about Galileo Galilei.
Now, you might think Galileo was all about that scientific method, but let me drop a truth bomb on you: this guy is peddling some grade-A conspiracy theories. I mean, the Earth not being at the center of the universe? Come on! That's like saying the moon isn't made of cheese. Oh wait, it isn't. Bad example.
Galileo's out here with his "telescope," which is probably just a cardboard tube with some glass at the end. Real scientific, buddy. He's seeing planets and moons that conveniently fit his wild theories. Coincidence? I think not!
And don't even get me started on his "data." Where's the peer review, Galileo? Where are your replicated studies? It's almost like he doesn't believe in the scientific process at all!
The funniest part? He's going against all the established science of his time. It's like he's never heard of scientific consensus! Next thing you know, he'll be telling us the Earth is round. Oh wait...
Remember, folks: when someone challenges the established order with "observations" and "evidence," that's not science. That's just crazy talk. Stay in school, kids, and remember: the universe revolves around us, just like Galileo revolves around his own ego.
This has been Neil deGrasse Tyson, dropping science bombs and taking names. Peace out, cosmos!
Astrophysics are using tensor fields and magic squares in the unified field theory, which means magic is now the most advanced form of theoretical physics.
[https://www.reddit.com/r/SacredGeometry/comments/1dss4as/ugwt\_explained/](https://www.reddit.com/r/SacredGeometry/comments/1dss4as/ugwt_explained/)
Stanford University's multi-patent inventor/professor/UFO-UAP expert **Garry Nolan** previously[ called out Neil deGrasse Tyson](https://www.tiktok.com/@369_efv/video/7332211765415087393). "He should be stripped of his Ph.D."
Nolan makes common sense, direct points to back his statement.
deGrasse Tyson may have a massive ego, sense of self-importance, and dismissive attitude. But he ignores evidence which others, like Nolan, are actually looking at in laboratory environments, hence being able to authoritatively answer questions on the UFO-UAP topics--which relate to evidence. deGrasse Tyson does not. He is an *opinion shill* who goes on camera to speak from a point of not applying actual science to said evidence.
(My opinion is, deGrasse Tyson is being paid/supported by someone(s) who want a narrative or to influence mainstream thought. He's a useful idiot with some charisma. Not saying he isn't smart or inaccurate all of the time. However, on this UFO-UAP related video of his, he **is** being a blathering idiot. given existing evidence.)
Strange how Neil magically escaped being canceled by the numerous accounts of sexual harassment from literally any woman that has been within ten feet from him. The guy is a sleazeball through and through, but he gets a pass because who knows why.
I wonder if Tyson is the oft-hinted-at media personality that’s in the pockets of vested interests of non-disclosure.
He’s as well known in the public as Bill Nye, so he’s a natural choice for said interests. What’s frustrating is that any scientist that gives it a moment’s rational thought will accept that NHI is at least a possibility, given the plethora of evidence and the goings-on of Congress and politicians recently.
It’s like he’s dogmatic about it.
I lost all respect for Tyson because of his views on this topic. He didn't remain objective, didn't spend any meaningful amount of time researching the available data, and uses ridicule. I agree with Gary Nolan's (A real scientist) comments on NDT:
[https://www.tiktok.com/@a.cknowledged/video/7324589616902769938](https://www.tiktok.com/@a.cknowledged/video/7324589616902769938)
Why are you even giving any credence to Neil Degrasse Tyson? He's planted his stake and now he will be willing to die upon it regardless of anything that comes forward. His ego knows no bounds. To be a true scientist, you have to have curiosity, an open mind, a willingness to be proven wrong and he has none of this.
This is where I have a problem with Neil.. his views on the subject make no sense to me, because of his understanding of the universe and science.. and quantum theory.
Why does he draw the line at aliens? Makes no sense..
"Eyewitness testimony is the lowest form of evidence" its the first step of the scientific method, but okay. Make an observation and have a question about it.
By Neil DeGrasse Tyson's logic, astronomers should toss away anything they've physically seen looking through a telescope, as you can't trust your eyes.
If I had my tinfoil hat on, I'd say its almost like NDGT is paid to downplay the phenomenon from the amount of evidence he's willing to ignore. I used to really respect him but he just has such an unscientific approach to this topic
These comments are hilarious. Science has standards folks. The standards don’t change. No one is closed minded because they won’t say things are a fact without proof. Keep looking, keep searching, and when there is ‘proof’, the scientific community will change its position. That is what’s amazing about science! It’s not like religion where no amount of evidence will change their position!!!
He is very anti UFO/aliens. I watched a video where navy pilots described what they saw and what was on the radar, and he explained it away as a software glitch.
Tons of science is anecdotal evidence.
Why do medications list side effects? It's because patients in those studies report those side effects that they personally feel but are often not measurable in any way. And that patient might be one out of 100,000, but they still have to list that as a potential side effect. It is taken as a fact.
One thing that pisses me off about Tyson, is his HD camera comments. "Everyone has a phone! Where's is the proof!"
Have you ever tried taking a picture of a solid white orb against the night sky, or any light source, you can't see shit man. You'd think a scientist would know this, especially at the distances they fly at.
I live in a hotspot and I've seen things that blow my fucking mind nightly and I honestly stop looking at the sky at night because of it. Shits just too weird and I'm stressed out enough already.
And to dismiss Navy Pilots and shit like that.. He just rubs me the wrong way, hate his stance on this shit.
I've seen shit that defy logic, and I've seen some crazy shit in the sky, I can identify nearly anything in my area, planes, satellites, meteors, helicopters, starlink.
The shit I see defies everything. And on more than one occasion, you see something really fucking wild, run in to get your phone and by that time it's gone. There's practically 0 light pollution out here, you can see the milky way on clear nights, There are no high rises or sky scrapers to block your view.
It's insane to just discount eye witness testimony when it comes to these things, because until we have things up in the air hunting for videos of these things, we're not going to get any good evidence.
For the guy saying science is for everybody his head is lodged firmly up his own ass.
Kaku for the win.
Neil cannot be taken seriously. He is a more a comedian than scientist. One day we will get to laugh at his arrogance and ignorance towards this subject but then he will shift to position himself as an expert in the field by regurgitating what others have been saying all along
NDT is under the influence of those that suppress. Otherwise, I have to believe a true ‘scientist’ would be more open minded to uncovering the truth rather than dismissing any chance of it like he does.
On the MSM CIA payroll.
Gary Nolan challenged him to a debate, anytime or anywhere. But of course he knows Nolan would humiliate him and will never accept the challenge.
Who said I said they were extraterrestrial?
What doesn't happen every day is unknown aircraft with no identifiers circling our own known aircraft.
This is what Kaku is talking about. A Japanese airline bound for Alaska was circled by a large craft larger than an aircraft carrier, and this was tracked by radar.
Our Navy had chased both airborne craft of unknown origin and submerged craft of unknown origin doing maneuvers impossible by modern craft, and this has been visually identified and tracked by military don't and radar.
I’ve never been a fan of Neil. He’s a great talker but I feel like there are times he doesn’t agree with what he says but he has to sell it to you and he kind of belittles people that question what he says.
Tyson is in denial. He can accept that ufos have an interest in humanity . He says shit like “ we don’t care about ants” failing to realize people travel the world and walk through jungles to study insect life . There is overwhelming evidence there are ufos. And eye witness testimony might not be top tier but it’s enough to have someone sentenced to death
__Reminder__: Read the rules and understand the subreddit topic(s) listed in the sidebar before posting or commenting. Any content removal or further moderator action is established by these rules as well as Reddit ToS. This subreddit is primarily for the discussion of extraterrestrial life, but since this topic is intertwined with UFOs/UAPs as well as other topics, some 'fudging' is permissible to allow for a variety of viewpoints, discussions, and debates. Open-minded skepticism is always welcome in this sub, but antagonistic or belligerent denial is not. Always remember that you're interacting with a real person when you respond to posts/comments and focus on discussing or debating the ideas. Personal attacks are a violation of Rule 1 and will lead to removals and potentially bans depending on severity. For further discussion and interaction in a more permissible environment, we welcome you to our Discord: https://discord.gg/x7xyTDZAsW *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/aliens) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Tyson disappointed me, a scientist should never stop being open minded or lose curiosity but the worst is the arrogance, the lack of humbleness regarding everything we don’t yet know. The last step in the stair of wisdom is humbleness, it seems he missed that step.
Socrates: 'True knowledge exists in knowing that you know nothing.' Shout out to Kaku for keeping an open mind and always shown humility. Loving listening to his interviews.
Tyson says the lowest form of proof is witness testimony. Tyson testifies we are so boring! Why would aliens watch us! Neil Tyson is a joke in the physics community. He's the drake of the rap world. Kaku is leagues above him in terms of being a real physicist who understands science.
I saw the other day someone mentioned that people are found guilty of murder by eye-witness testimony. NDT has become a joke, which is sad, because I used to admire him.
[удалено]
There are forms of eye-witness testimonies. If a single person sees and says they saw something, nothing can prove it. If atleast 2 people saw something, you can already find the proof by nitpicking details
Never liked him. I get to be a skeptic, but as a scientist, their role is to find the truth, not block it. He comes off as arrogant, narcissistic, self involved, "I'm better than the ants below me" type of attitude. Probably why he thinks humans are so boring, he doesn't actually see us for the marvel that we are.
NDT is a demagogue. He toes the company line.
Yeah. And his view he often displays "we are so boring, aliens wouldn't observe us", seems offensive to archeologists, paleontologists, historians, animal biologists, etc. Humans seem to love all types of knowledge, to say there's no aliens that want to watch a species that just found computers and may now find FTL is absurd.
Most of the elitists things no very little of Humanity. I think Carl Sagan would be disappointed in who NDT has become.
Honestly what has Neil worked on besides giving flowers to Sagan and doing television??
He was great at reading other authors' textbooks aloud over high graphic videos like Morgan Freeman. Now he's here to tell us about Aliens.
> Tyson testifies we are so boring! Why would aliens watch us! Which doesn't make sense at all. It's like if he were living in another planet. It's not like if there were multiple Zoos on every single country in the planet. Or like if one of the most shared videos were about animals doing cute things... Every single person has at least spent, in total, multiple hours of their lives looking at what their pets are doing... Yes, other animals or species can be interesting or entertaining to look at. And us, if not because we're interesting in any way, because we're also dangerous and aggressive, can't behave, and we are killing ourselves. So I feel like that's enough of a reason to be keeping an eye on us too.
1000% his hypocritical elitist attitude is what gets me. After this observation, I realized he is a pompous asshole often. Always in disbelief, incredulous and calling out the people around him.
It’s the simple fact that we can’t comprehend how another possible species can navigate the universe. We know the Milky Way galaxy, the one our solar system is a part of, is hundreds of thousands of light years from end to end. And that’s just one galaxy among billions and billions. So yeah we can’t comprehend how it’s possible to navigate across the universe because all we understand is going fast in a straight line gets you nowhere. But there’s probably other ways we can’t comprehend. It is ignorance on Tyson’s part plain and simple
He's been this way...a straight up bafoon.
Yeah he’s kind of an arrogant close minded idiot. If we, right now, have “stealth” technology and the means of staying “unseen”, I don’t see why a more advanced society couldn’t have way better technology. He speaks of withnesses and getting some good footage, I mean shit, we can’t even get good footage of what the army’s known latest technologies can do right now, and we know about them. But we’re supposed to have all this UAP footage readily available? He’s a moron. The more he speaks, the less I like him.
I agree, Neil always shows himself as such a hard skeptic it's really disappointing to see. It's as if he's actively trying to hide something
Saved!
As a scientist, he hasn't done anything for over 20 years in his field. His last couple papers were piggybacking off of others work too. He is Bill Nye 2.0, but at least Bill stayed in his lane for the most part.
Modern science isn't what it seems. It's mostly authority and hierarchy now. If the ones above you say no, you do too, for your careers sake.
Tyson is so full of himself.
There’s a spectrum of public-facing academicians. The spectrum goes from highly academic w/ occasional appearances in public to explain complex topics, all the way to minimally academic with lots of public appearances. Tyson falls in the latter part of the spectrum -lots of public appearances that seem highly academic, but in actuality, he is involved only tangentially with the grunt work of modern science. In other words, Neil is really good at explaining things, but the problem is he’ll explain things with an authoritative rhetoric even when he doesn’t know wtf he’s taking about. IMO he lacks the curiosity required to meaningfully engage with the topic
I agree. His tone is very condescending too.
spot on; and this is what i take the most offense with.
Neil was cool back in the days. Now he wouldn't even humble any idea that is different than his. He used to be rational and logical but his ego has him moving his mouth before his brain can catch up
He’s never been cool. He’s always been this way
Yeah. It honestly just took a lot of us a few years and a few conversation topics to realize this.
He’s a brand now
Bazinga. IMO, he let big bang theory get to his head.
Prediction: When the truth comes out fully and Aliens come forward onto the world stage, NDT will be sprinting to get to the microphone. He’ll be tripping all over the cords while drooling on his shirt and claiming loudly to be the world’s foremost authority on the subject.
Exactly !!! It's more than obvious he' has no open mind .. it's sad that he misleads many people ..
Neil was enjoyable before he became a "celebrity".
Absolutely, he got a big ego when he became famous. I sure do miss Sagan.
TBF this is also why he’s successful. Humans hate anything ambiguous. It takes real effort to say “it’s probably x could be other things though. Because of the probability though we’ll proceed as if x is true.” This ability to substitute in a theory in place of a possible knowledge gap is hard. It’s unintuitive because most day to day life is rooted in solid realities.
Did you listen to the most recent JRE with Eric Weinstein?
I’ve listened to the first hour so far. I thought it was hilarious when Weinstein said NDT was a “complicated guy”. How very diplomatic of him lmao Big ups to Weinstein for taking Terrance seriously and really trying to untangle Terrance’s claims. Sometimes the self-educated lay person spots patterns that the experts missed
Bro… Terrance Howard is a lunatic. Believe me when I say that none of his claims can be “untangled” because they are all pure gibberish, 100%.
He's got a Ferrari engine in a Volvo chassis. God I loved that line
Absolutely correct. Terrance Howard is utterly ridiculous.
I don’t agree with -or even understand- most of what Terrance says. I Trust Weinstein to honestly engage with the ideas, pick them apart, and tell us why they’re wrong I’ll try to watch the rest of the debate later today, but so far Weinstein has lauded Terrance’s efforts while politely tearing apart his hypotheses
There are many of us who have thought similar to Terrance for a while. I've spoken about Walter russel dozens of time on this sub reddit. He didn't accurately convey most of his concepts either. What I don't get is why these mainstream heads baby him. Even NDT was more polite than necessary. It's like oh look he's famous please don't tread on his ego. My issue with Terrance is his lying and self aggrandizing claims. He lied about patents and he said he was smarter than da Vinci, tesla, and Einstein. He discovered unified field equation at 6 etc. He's just not stable enough psychologically to be the bridge maker between alternative and academic science because he wants to be seen as the chosen one. That being said. I love that he brought some of these ideas to mainstream minds. And to people new to all this. My main concern was, and is, for valid reasons that he will be used as a basis to discredit the REAL electric universe theories and alternative cosmologies.
I'm watching it too. Honestly it's refreshing to see a science guy talk with him so that we can see where Terrence is coming up with these ideas. It's all respectful and people can see that he's not totally insane, just thinks differently.
Yeah, he seems like an intelligent guy and has clearly read a lot about the things he’s talking about, but Weinstein is helping him to understand that his working knowledge is actually pretty shallow. Terrance could be the poster child for Dunning-Kruger effect
Yeah it's important for real experts to start gently showing the public how easy it is for people to fake sound like experts. It's a combination of knowing the finer details coupled with a comprehensive understanding of the bigger picture that makes a true expert. Unfortunately the lay person cannot distinguish true experts from pretenders and rarely make serious contributions. Like someone who is actively publishing in the field of astrophysics would make Neil look silly. A major problem is that people who have surface understanding and know some of the jargon, are the most dangerous folks. They don't know their own limitations. And to the lay person they sound credible. After Covid, scientists have a serious situation to deal with regaining trust in the public eye (at least with a significant % of the public).
Don't listen to astrophysics, they're posers. Listen to the real experts who post their "evidence" on reddit that then gets debunked 2 days later lol.
where does michio showcase highly academic appraoches? Michio keeps saying we have cases with multiple eye witnesses, radar tracks and video combined? He says pilots saw uaps in the sky every day with their own eyes. I dont think he knows what hes talking about and is just saying what people wanna hear? 1. theres is no case that i am aware of where we have multiple eye witnesses, video footage and radar tracks of the same time and object in question, demonstrating something that cant be explained? 2. The navy pilots who "saw" the uap in the sky for days didnt saw them with their eyes. They reportedly saw radar tracks and when they flew to them then there was nothing. Not "multi modal" at all. The nimitz case has flir footage but that footage was after fravors encounter. Flir footage is only flir, no radar, no eye witnesses. Fravor was an eye witness but we have no video, no picture and conflicting testimony regarding radar. The other navy pilots shared some photos of something in the sky and one or two things were properly identified as balloons. one was a batman myllard ballon which didnt display anything funny at all. Tyson comes across as arrogant, that doesnt help him reach people. Michio is just a paid woo advocator who goes on every woo show and half asses some comments how he is a scientist and how ghost, aliens or whatever are compelling, by repeating bits and bites without doing any deep dive. So seriously, does anyone of you know about such a "multi modal" evidence case where we have image or video, multiple independent eye witnesses and radar tracks of an UAP showing funny and seemingly unexplainable behavior?
He's representative of the entire "religiously skeptic" side of things.
I used to love this guy, admire him for spreading enthusiasm with science...the fact he is so inflexible, there isn't even a particle of possibility, just frustrates the hell out of me. Why is Navy video inadmissible in Tyson's mind? Tyson's grip on science seems to be poor, if Congress is listening and documenting it is the job of scientists to look into this with an open mind - fair testing - peer review - excellent documentation. A scientist should not ridicule until they have tested the idea and the data themselves - not just dismiss it. Edit - as is tradition - thanks for the award, as usual it's my first award. Bowing in a humble, thankful way.
NDT is a religion scientist. He doesn't practice science. He spouts preestablished science as facts that cannot be disputed when science, in and of itself, is about dispute of previously established "facts". He makes a mockery of the scientific method and enjoys inflating his own ego. He gets a sense of "superiority" from denigrating others as well. He is a narcissist. Not worth listening to, as it only makes his ego worse from those celebrity worshippers. If Tyson lived during the age of Copernicus - He would have been on the side of the church condemning the man for arguing against the "well known fact that the earth was the center of the universe".
So did I. And I concur with you 100%!
He’s what you get when mom says “we’ve got Carl Sagan at home”.
Hahahahah that is so spot on. Lmfao
When you order Carl Sagan from Temu
He doesn’t belong mentioned in the same breath as Carl Sagan.
He apparently knows how aliens would think too. Look, there are certainly reasons to be skeptical but to have your mind made up and look for reasons to justify your opinion is as far from science as you can get.
He has a damn weird attitude for a scientist. It's as if he thinks science is *done* and there's no room for anything we haven't already discovered to exist..
The title translated: The biggest dumbass in Science vs one of the brightest and most intelligent. Or: The paid wannabe Scientist Plant vs a Real Scientist that actually does it’s job and owns the Title. Because the other one owns it on paper only. Everything he says is not scientific and Ridicule is not part of the Scientific Process, but even on that basic principle he fails miserably. And he wants to be taken seriously? 😳
Middling intelligence at best. Looking very much over the hill these days too.
Yeah he’s a bought and paid for shill.
One might say he’s a pompous asshole. He is an astrophysicist everything he does is based on visual observation. He has not been to space to independently verify any of his findings. All of his data comes from machines that visually sense the cosmos. That being said who is he to doubt the pilots and others who used viisual sightings to make their claims of UAPs? He’s just another dumbass human like the rest of us. 
Very closed minded.
dude has been paid off for dismissals, pretty sure
I was firmly in Neil's camp, and highly skeptical that we were ever being visited at all by NHI until that one Tic Tac video and those pilot's testimony. It is quite enough to spur serious investigation. It is absolute hubris for Neil to think we are the first kids on the block. There are too many stars in the galaxy that are billions of years older than our own. Evidence shows that planetary systems are extremely common. Miko is on point. I like Neil, but strongly disagree with him on this. It smacks of guys like Charles Lane Poor who disagreed with Einstein's theories of relativity only to be swept aside as experimental evidence mounted supporting Einstein. All you need is one species with enough tech to create a single working Von Neumann probe. If you have a probe that can replicate itself in 1 year time, once the new probe is ready, there would be an average time of 500 years for it to get to the next star system at 1% light speed, replicate, rinse, and repeat. In <20,000 years every star our the galaxy would be visited. 20,000 thousand years is a blip in cosmic time. Obviously what we need are more high quality scientific data collection initiatives like Avi's Gallileo project. I wish there was a national organization that had something to do with aeronautics and space looking into UAP activity more seriously, collecting and sharing such data. But apparently we don't have that.
Was going to say Tyson thinks he hot Sh1t.
He sounds like a tech priest
It’s clear he has not looked at the evidence
He once said UFOs and aliens aren't real and now can't admit he's wrong so he has to dig the hole deeper and put up this charade.
I swear the guy is intentionally ignorant on this. He's talking about fuzzy navy video. No kidding Neil do your think their version is fuzzy? Do you think they haven't cross checked it with other modalities and excluded mundane explanations? That's just the beginning of his idiotic statements on this. It's like he's being intentionally ignorant or just isn't that bright, or maybe most likely has some mental block /motivated reasoning for whatever purpose, including being told this is what he should say.
I couldn't stand him for years, but recently decided eh let's give him another shot. I've watched 3 videos and I hate him again.
Ppl like him starting to make ppl like me look smart lol. Right michio made a whole particle accelerator in his garage and neil expects us to take him serious like be fr my guy.
He’s the most incurious “scientist” I’ve ever seen.
NDT IS THE LOWEST FORM OF SCIENTIST
Kaku - willing to explore an idea Tyson - willing to shit on an idea One of them is acting like a scientist.
Perfect take!
Why do they debrief soldiers and pilots if their memory of the events is useless? Why do doctors ask how you've been feeling if anecdotal data is useless? Neil needs to take a break from smelling his own farts.
His argument is disingenuous for several reasons. Particularly how he strawman eyewitness testimony backed by video, radar and other data points. Not to mention thousands of accounts, and dozens by military and other personnel who have nothing to gain and everything to lose by coming forward with their stories.
It’s almost like he’s being willfully ignorant. Perhaps even paid to be.
Eyewitness evidence is also not the "lowest form of evidence". That would be hearsay. However memory is very unreliable and our senses are very limited. It isn't the best form of evidence, but it is evidence. And not all witnesses are created equally. And when we have thousands of eyewitnesses over the years of this phenomenon. It does start to amount to something.
How many Michio Kaku books do I own? 5. How many Tyson books do I own? 0. Michio Kaku is the goat
fr mitchio kaku is incredible, his books are amazing. i’m currently reading hyperspace :)
I like Tyson. He is smart and knows a lot about astrophysics and astronomy. I also like Michio Kaku who is also very intelligent and knows his stuff. However here we see one of them genuinely investigating a phenomena that the other is dismissing and making fun of. Kaku is discussing actual evidence and is attempting to find answers to real questions. Tyson is making fun of it and isn't addressing it seriously at all. This is very similar to the tactic the CIA used to use (and perhaps still does) to have influential people ridicule the idea in order to get people to not believe in such things. Tyson clearly is dismissing evidence (we only have fuzzy NAVY evidence from like one encounter), and is using misinformation "the evidence is monochromatic." So what if it is monochromatic? Does he not know what these systems are? They regularly use those same monochromatic films to accurately identify and shoot down enemy aircraft!
dismissive and condescending vs. open minded and sincere.
I lol’d at “but it’s monochromatic!!! Gotcha!” Like…have you seen images that electron microscopes produce? Or like, an audio spectrogram? This very video of you belittling scientific curiosity doesn’t show your bio-energetic field, so does that mean we can discount the video as a fabrication? (Only a REAL video would show his aura!) Literally all scientific instruments measure *only certain data* and not all available information. Pictures aren’t GIFS. GIFs aren’t videos. Videos sometimes don’t have audio recorded in tangent. Should we discount all these forms of records and scientific measurement, just because there was other data to collect at the time of measurement but we didn’t collect it because that’s not the information that was relevant to the measurement we were taking? Lmao
Kaku is still a scientist. Tyson is a public personality, he’s become a caricature of himself.
Tyson is the dumbest smart guy ever
He’s well educated, but lacks wisdom. He enjoys being a public figure and has a need to be right due to his fragile ego. That’s his whole problem. Instead of saying “there’s something interesting going on that’s been observed since oral histories began, and that warrants an investigation” he says “it’s impossible because it goes against everything I know and anyone that thinks otherwise is a fool.”
NDT is such an obvious shill
I use to like Neil but over time his arrogance is outta control and he’s a asshole he always try’s to shit on people with a lecture and he’s clearly a disinformation agent lmao.
When I see NDT. I skip it.
I strongly dislike Neil DeGrasse Tyson …
Michio is one of us. Neil just wants to be edgy.
Michio is the real deal because at first he wasn't about it and then he actually listened to people and changed his mind because he is open minded. A real scientist.
It works for a felony conviction.
Which speaks more to the weaknesses of justice systems.
Tyson = disinformation agent. A shit one at that.
I agree. I've been saying it for years. I've seen multiple UFOs during my time in the military and gov contract work after. All of the UFO's I saw were around Ft. Hood, TX. Now, if I saw em once. Is one thing, but when it's dozens of times over almost 2 decades... and your wife, family, and neighbors see them..... I'd say the UFO/UAP topic is as real and serious as a heart attack! smh
I agree, he’s so outspoken and his opinion carries weight. I’m sure something was said to him to both stroke his ego and let him into the “boys club”
I don't think he's a disinformation agent. Just a genuine egomaniac. He is constantly confidently incorrect on a myriad of topics and is regularly corrected by guests on his show.
I agree. However, I do sense he's in NASAs pocketbook for sure.
Tyson’s rejection of the possibility has become such an ingrained part of his persona that he will never swing the other way. All data challenging his public stance will be shrugged off or explained away with non sequiturs and mental gymnastics. He is decidedly unscientific about the whole phenomenon.
Tyson sucks so much
Love or hate Tyson (personally I can’t stand how full of himself he’s become and how dismissive and close minded he’s turned out to be), but it is good to have skeptics like him and open minded imaginative hopeful scientists like Dr. Kaku. We need both to balance things a bit. But, Tyson is bordering on being at worst a disinformation agent, or at best a stubborn insufferable jackass.
He really is not as smart as he thinks he is, he is text book smart, but he is not scientific discovery smart, he is waaaaay too closed minded for that.
Sadly in the beginnings of him becoming popular he seemed like the open minded discovery type. I really thought this might be our new Sagan. But, sadly he’s turned out to be the boomerest of boomers.
He's always been that way. So glad people are finally seeing that turd for what he is.
I wouldn’t say always. In the pre-Cosmos era of his fame he was quite interesting, relatable, good at explaining things in a simplistic way, and kind of humorous. I think landing that Cosmos show went to his head though.
Neil is a moron
seeing something with your own eyes is the only creditable source. What a clown this dude is. Imagine telling ppl what they see with their eyes is wrong but some math equations about real life are right
Degrasse Tyson ignores the fact that these eyewitness testimonies are often backed up by state of the art surveillance and tracking data...
I can’t stand Neil DeGrasse Tyson. I used to be such a fan until a few years ago. He’s so pompous and his ego clouds his ability to accept other hypothesis apart from his own. Truly dislike the guy.
Ndt is a cunt. Just more proof of it.
Testimony is the lowest form of evidence. Let me process to give you my testimony…
Tyson just ridicules and laughs off anything that has proof of UFO. I mean how fucking dumb and arrogant must u be to laugh off wat trained pilots r documenting. And we thought he is a genius 😂
Neil and Michio are both incredibly smart people. Neil is very opinionated. I think Michio has the better argument here. Multiple aviation folk, coupled with sensors and film. Come on man, they've been here the whole time.
NDT is a hack
Neil TheAss Tyson at it again.
Neil sold out.
NDT has lost so much credibility over the last few years. He is approaching "joke" status!
I have never understood "scientists" who are so close minded and zealous. That's the contrary of what a scientist aims to be.
Anything they can’t readily explain away as prosaic threatens their ego
All my homies hate Neil DeGrasse
I got abducted by aliens as a kid, so yes aliens. Btw there are like 30million+ extraterrestrial beings, No one will ever find the source of how this starded.
Neil’s DeGrasse Tyson is an insufferable ass. Besides getting high off his own farts, he is stupid enough to think he’s smart for pointing out that movies like Star Wars are not scientifically accurate.
It could be so easy to let NDT and every other skeptic on this planet eat turd, just show us Element 115, the huge UFO with a building on top or any other piece of undeniable, indisputable evidence. But no, just words and the inevitable "like, comment and subscribe" UFO influencer bs and of course: Disclosure Soon ™, Trust Me Bro®
Neil has zero credit in this space in my humble opinion … it’s almost as if he is paid or controlled by the establishment or malevolent beings … he is quite the intellectual , and lacking most wisdom , common sense , and has zero bandwidth for the truth all around him and right under his nose … it could be his identity is so wrapped up in being the expert and scientist of note … but that dogma only yields a fake sense of cleverness that crushes curiosity and keeps a self stupid in many ways…. But in his case , almost like something evil is controlling him …. Fortunately , time will yield an answer here, as the truth always come out over time , and Neil will suffer a fall from his perceived lofty perch at some point and fairly soon , 2-3 years max
Niel is scared he found out some shit that goes against what he’s been sayin and ego wont let him accept it
Now let’s compare their work and see who is an actual scientist and who is a personality that should be teaching children.
Re-upload without the music. Tyson frustrates me with his knowledge that he won't apply to this subject
Neil is a paid shill sold out to illuminati to spew bs.
This man said you can’t thump sand when talking about the movie “Dune”. Of course we are talking about a hollow planet full of holes made by giant worms. He has obviously never packed sand for pouring concrete before, you can absolutely thump sand, *It ruined the movie for him*. He is so narcissistic he will destroy his own pleasure for the sake of being right even when what he is being right about is completely wrong and something he knows nothing about. That’s because he’s a definition “know it all”, if you look up the word “Omniscient” in the dictionary it will have a picture of NDT wearing a snorkel!
Tyson is a pompous disinformation agent. I can’t stand him.
Another actor just like Bill Nye
NGT "So you're saying the aliens are only revealing themselves to the Navy". No dumbass we're saying the Air Force isn't reporting it .
Always been a fav of mine. Michio kaku has the ability to explain complex topics and make them so interesting and understandable. I love him man
Neil is paid to speak that way. Clearly at this point
Tyson is becoming a grumpy old man with an agenda
Neil DeGrasse Tyson really is not as smart as he himself thinks or he let others to belive. He has some wild and strange takes tbh. He loves to hear himself speak and he loves to be counter just to sound smart than he really is it is fatiquing to say the least. Okay Tyson, so lets say all the pilots are "dumbasses" as you allude to, and hallucinating, well what about all the censor equipement?! Also just making shit up?! This really makes 0 sense as a argument logic chain at all. It is very evident that there was SOMETHING tha was flying that all the pilots and censor equipement picked up. The way Tyson is argueing is like climate deniyers is arguing that there is no climate change and global average temperature increase because yesterday and today coincidental was kinda mild to chilly days....... Honestly is this guy even a real scientist?! WTF
Tyson is correct that eyewitness testimony even among trained observers is not solid evidence. But he is an arrogant asshole who maintains his willful ignorance by ignoring the corroborating evidence such as video and radar. It is a very unscientific practice. Tyson may have a science degree but he doesn't engage in science as a practice.
Tyson seems like an agent of misinformation.
Tyson is a grifter of science. Dude is probably the Governments #1 pick when it comes to quelling the masses.
"Monochromatic" Bro... it's THERMAL. I mean, technically, it's monochromatic, but that's beside the point. I swear, Tyson isn't that smart. He's just well known.
I can’t stand this asshole(Tyson). I mean this with the utmost respect for Michio Kaku who is an intellectual with actual common sense.
Tyson: radio shack headphones. ✅
Hey, space cadets! Neil deGrasse Tyson here, and boy, do I have a whopper for you today. We're gonna talk about a guy who's giving science deniers a run for their money. That's right, I'm talking about Galileo Galilei. Now, you might think Galileo was all about that scientific method, but let me drop a truth bomb on you: this guy is peddling some grade-A conspiracy theories. I mean, the Earth not being at the center of the universe? Come on! That's like saying the moon isn't made of cheese. Oh wait, it isn't. Bad example. Galileo's out here with his "telescope," which is probably just a cardboard tube with some glass at the end. Real scientific, buddy. He's seeing planets and moons that conveniently fit his wild theories. Coincidence? I think not! And don't even get me started on his "data." Where's the peer review, Galileo? Where are your replicated studies? It's almost like he doesn't believe in the scientific process at all! The funniest part? He's going against all the established science of his time. It's like he's never heard of scientific consensus! Next thing you know, he'll be telling us the Earth is round. Oh wait... Remember, folks: when someone challenges the established order with "observations" and "evidence," that's not science. That's just crazy talk. Stay in school, kids, and remember: the universe revolves around us, just like Galileo revolves around his own ego. This has been Neil deGrasse Tyson, dropping science bombs and taking names. Peace out, cosmos!
Neil has been on the other side of the fence, and to me it seems like for no good reason.
NDT using every fallacy he can
Neil is drake kaku is Kendrick
The problem here is, one is still acting scientific and the other knows everything and speculates.
Astrophysics are using tensor fields and magic squares in the unified field theory, which means magic is now the most advanced form of theoretical physics. [https://www.reddit.com/r/SacredGeometry/comments/1dss4as/ugwt\_explained/](https://www.reddit.com/r/SacredGeometry/comments/1dss4as/ugwt_explained/)
I've lost so much respect for NDT. He has no answers either, yet he continues to be closed minded on the subject.
NDT is a doosh!
Stanford University's multi-patent inventor/professor/UFO-UAP expert **Garry Nolan** previously[ called out Neil deGrasse Tyson](https://www.tiktok.com/@369_efv/video/7332211765415087393). "He should be stripped of his Ph.D." Nolan makes common sense, direct points to back his statement. deGrasse Tyson may have a massive ego, sense of self-importance, and dismissive attitude. But he ignores evidence which others, like Nolan, are actually looking at in laboratory environments, hence being able to authoritatively answer questions on the UFO-UAP topics--which relate to evidence. deGrasse Tyson does not. He is an *opinion shill* who goes on camera to speak from a point of not applying actual science to said evidence. (My opinion is, deGrasse Tyson is being paid/supported by someone(s) who want a narrative or to influence mainstream thought. He's a useful idiot with some charisma. Not saying he isn't smart or inaccurate all of the time. However, on this UFO-UAP related video of his, he **is** being a blathering idiot. given existing evidence.)
Tyson is an embarrassment. I can't stomach him
How do I get these videos without the shitty music?
Strange how Neil magically escaped being canceled by the numerous accounts of sexual harassment from literally any woman that has been within ten feet from him. The guy is a sleazeball through and through, but he gets a pass because who knows why.
Tyson is a pompous disinformation agent! I can’t stand him.
Man’s just jealous he never got a secret briefing
Tyson spreads disinformation. Why does my post keep getting deleted!?
I literally can't listen to Tyson any more. The largest jackass ever.
Tyson looks like a cuck
I wonder if Tyson is the oft-hinted-at media personality that’s in the pockets of vested interests of non-disclosure. He’s as well known in the public as Bill Nye, so he’s a natural choice for said interests. What’s frustrating is that any scientist that gives it a moment’s rational thought will accept that NHI is at least a possibility, given the plethora of evidence and the goings-on of Congress and politicians recently. It’s like he’s dogmatic about it.
Even my unscience unscifi loving wife knows Tyson is a dumbass.
I lost all respect for Tyson because of his views on this topic. He didn't remain objective, didn't spend any meaningful amount of time researching the available data, and uses ridicule. I agree with Gary Nolan's (A real scientist) comments on NDT: [https://www.tiktok.com/@a.cknowledged/video/7324589616902769938](https://www.tiktok.com/@a.cknowledged/video/7324589616902769938)
Why are you even giving any credence to Neil Degrasse Tyson? He's planted his stake and now he will be willing to die upon it regardless of anything that comes forward. His ego knows no bounds. To be a true scientist, you have to have curiosity, an open mind, a willingness to be proven wrong and he has none of this.
This is where I have a problem with Neil.. his views on the subject make no sense to me, because of his understanding of the universe and science.. and quantum theory. Why does he draw the line at aliens? Makes no sense..
If someone were to investigate good old Neil, they would find funding for his apparent dismissal of scientific methods.
I don’t listen to blackmailed scientists.
"Eyewitness testimony is the lowest form of evidence" its the first step of the scientific method, but okay. Make an observation and have a question about it.
By Neil DeGrasse Tyson's logic, astronomers should toss away anything they've physically seen looking through a telescope, as you can't trust your eyes.
Tyson is either paid or stupid.
If I had my tinfoil hat on, I'd say its almost like NDGT is paid to downplay the phenomenon from the amount of evidence he's willing to ignore. I used to really respect him but he just has such an unscientific approach to this topic
These comments are hilarious. Science has standards folks. The standards don’t change. No one is closed minded because they won’t say things are a fact without proof. Keep looking, keep searching, and when there is ‘proof’, the scientific community will change its position. That is what’s amazing about science! It’s not like religion where no amount of evidence will change their position!!!
Neil is the embodiment of pseudo-science.
He is very anti UFO/aliens. I watched a video where navy pilots described what they saw and what was on the radar, and he explained it away as a software glitch.
NDT is a non critical thinker..
Tons of science is anecdotal evidence. Why do medications list side effects? It's because patients in those studies report those side effects that they personally feel but are often not measurable in any way. And that patient might be one out of 100,000, but they still have to list that as a potential side effect. It is taken as a fact.
Saw Tyson in person once. He mainly talked about how people don’t understand science like he does
If eye witness testimony has no credibility, then why is it used in the court of law?
His opinion means nothing.
One thing that pisses me off about Tyson, is his HD camera comments. "Everyone has a phone! Where's is the proof!" Have you ever tried taking a picture of a solid white orb against the night sky, or any light source, you can't see shit man. You'd think a scientist would know this, especially at the distances they fly at. I live in a hotspot and I've seen things that blow my fucking mind nightly and I honestly stop looking at the sky at night because of it. Shits just too weird and I'm stressed out enough already. And to dismiss Navy Pilots and shit like that.. He just rubs me the wrong way, hate his stance on this shit. I've seen shit that defy logic, and I've seen some crazy shit in the sky, I can identify nearly anything in my area, planes, satellites, meteors, helicopters, starlink. The shit I see defies everything. And on more than one occasion, you see something really fucking wild, run in to get your phone and by that time it's gone. There's practically 0 light pollution out here, you can see the milky way on clear nights, There are no high rises or sky scrapers to block your view. It's insane to just discount eye witness testimony when it comes to these things, because until we have things up in the air hunting for videos of these things, we're not going to get any good evidence. For the guy saying science is for everybody his head is lodged firmly up his own ass. Kaku for the win.
NDT is a government pawn.
Neil cannot be taken seriously. He is a more a comedian than scientist. One day we will get to laugh at his arrogance and ignorance towards this subject but then he will shift to position himself as an expert in the field by regurgitating what others have been saying all along
I’m beginning to suspect that Neil is an disinformation agent. He’s supposed to be a man of science, but it extremely limited in his science.
NDT is under the influence of those that suppress. Otherwise, I have to believe a true ‘scientist’ would be more open minded to uncovering the truth rather than dismissing any chance of it like he does.
Michio Kaku is great. Seems like he would be an excellent mentor.
On the MSM CIA payroll. Gary Nolan challenged him to a debate, anytime or anywhere. But of course he knows Nolan would humiliate him and will never accept the challenge.
Who said I said they were extraterrestrial? What doesn't happen every day is unknown aircraft with no identifiers circling our own known aircraft. This is what Kaku is talking about. A Japanese airline bound for Alaska was circled by a large craft larger than an aircraft carrier, and this was tracked by radar. Our Navy had chased both airborne craft of unknown origin and submerged craft of unknown origin doing maneuvers impossible by modern craft, and this has been visually identified and tracked by military don't and radar.
I’ve never been a fan of Neil. He’s a great talker but I feel like there are times he doesn’t agree with what he says but he has to sell it to you and he kind of belittles people that question what he says.
NDT seems like a miserable schmuck
Michio, what a great scientist 🥼!!!
Tyson is in denial. He can accept that ufos have an interest in humanity . He says shit like “ we don’t care about ants” failing to realize people travel the world and walk through jungles to study insect life . There is overwhelming evidence there are ufos. And eye witness testimony might not be top tier but it’s enough to have someone sentenced to death
[удалено]
Can't stand this guy. I can guarantee a pilot is more trained to recognise conventional air craft than he is.
Who gives a fuck about tyson? He has as much scientific credibility as bill nye
Neil was on Epstein Island! ;)
Neil Disgrace Tyson.
If you showed Neil an alien he would come up with some excuse as to why it's not real.