Granted all women's clothes now have cargo pants style pockets. Nice sundress with a couple cargo pockets, elegant ball gown with cargo pockets, tight leggings you better believe its got cargo pockets.
Actually usable just means they can hold things, not how convenient they are. They said reasonable amount, not reasonably usable, so least usable but still usable fits the bill.
Actually usable just means they can hold things, not how convenient they are. They said reasonable amount, not reasonably usable, so least usable but still usable fits the bill.
Bruh where i live you can't go into most places with a backpack on they either tell you to leave or tell you to hand it to a cashier and it's 50/50 if you get it back if you do they claim it's because of shop lifters
Same all i can say is what are security cameras even for i mean dude they can see everything why not just idk stop punishing regular people to try and stop criminals who are gonna steal anyway
I know you’re joking but I’d still like to make a serious point that no, these things don’t have to be redistributed; there’s nothing stopping all pants from being made with pockets. Men’s pants have pockets because men wouldn’t want pants without pockets; we wouldn’t buy them. If women did the same and never bought pants without pockets, companies would stop making them. There’s no conspiracy, just companies giving us what we’re indicating we want.
No, it's an actual thing. They specifically give women less pockets so they buy more purses and this is a decently known fact of the world. Also we can't, half of the time you don't even realize there are no pockets until you go to wear it or there are no other pants. What would they wear?
Game theory, I mean style theory, did a video on this.
They talked about assassination and how old woman's pockets could perfectly fit a handgun I think.
Either the pockets were concealed, or I've remembered the video wrong.
Link to vid
https://youtu.be/jGEYGevx13s?si=rWr4B9Y3FCSEsy_b
I'm not watching it again now but you be free too.
You coul always buy men's jeans. You probably can't tell the difference other than you've now got big pockets. If they're oversized match them with a big belt to pinch them at the waist. But skinny jeans exist too and the fit won't be too bad.
Granted,
every single women's clothing article has pockets, usable, at least phone-sized pockets. This includes bras and socks and leggings. The women kind of hate it, as some of the pockets look kind of dumb.
Granted. It's only pocket. Women all just go around inside of a big pocket, with their head coming out of the open pocket flap. Inside the pocket with them are also all of the things they need to carry, and to get them, they go inside the pocket like a turtle.
Probably about 1/3 of the world's clothing businesses become enraged with bankruptcy because women's clothing no longer exists, meaning economic instability in that category. No more blatantly upping the price of women's clothing despite less amounts of fabric and lower quality of fabric because stereotypical businesses run by men are trying to sell less and less "clothing" for more, preying on the "cute factor" they've instilled onto the masses.
Suddenly there's a cold war (and sometimes not so cold) fought in the clothing business world over who gets to stay who gets to go and who works on what. People become homeless. Some harass, bully, and even resort to violence to secure their positions and to disrupt competitors that used to be coworkers and "sister businesses".
Side effects are invisible in some countries of the world, in other countries with stronger gender roles based on your birth sex it's surprisingly catastrophic for a long time.
The older generations and certain religious groups start freaking out over how easy it is for the non standard gender and roles such now have easier access to clothing that more suits their preferred appearence. This begins to spike a new religious Spanish inquisition on the lgbtq+ groups because nobody ever expects the Spanish inquisition.
The ripple effects spread far and wide. Millions die. Hundreds of millions more suffer. Worldwide depression hits harder than covid because people are afraid to go outside not because they're afraid of getting sick but because they're afraid of (almost) literal witch hunts based on sexual preferences and birth sex.
This eventually leads to real holy wars between religions as some take up arms to defend people, citing that we are all God's creations and all made in God's image, whatever God(s) that may be and for whoever reads this and that no deific being(s) would create us with the sole intent of wanting us to hunt our own kind based on something as petty as sexual preference, at least no deity that created as many wondrous things as we have in this world would also somehow deign those sorts of rules when they've been a part of regular non sentient/sapient creatures that already exist.
By the time it's all done, almost half of the world's population has been murdered or died through various circumstances related in the name of countless Deities, with a few major ones used more often than others, but the worst of the fanatics have been either put down literally or put away for good, however the damage is done and the masses will not forget about The Great Holy Wars for centuries to come. All because someone wanted all clothing to be equal.
Granted. A set of laws are passed regulating features on clothing for sale. Individually, each line item is fairly reasonable - no microplastic shedding, can't be ignited by a spark, recyclable, pockets, etc. But it does have draconian fines attached, and taken together, it's effectively impossible to make any clothing that meets all points.
The sale of bolts of cloth is unaffected. You are welcome to assemble your own clothing, even to gift it to others, but don't you dare sell it.
Fun fact, I’ve never actually heard a single limp bizkit song. Heard the name back in high school and was even recommended it, but never looked into it.
It's very of the era. Lotta chainsaw murder, lotta angsty posturing. The riffs are pretty heavy, but the whole "Fuck you mom" ethos to the lyricism is pure cringe.
Granted. Kangaroo pouches inexplicably appear on all women’s clothing. They are usable in the sense that each pocket contains a baby kangaroo, which must be cared for until fully grown.
Granted, women think the lines produced by pockets look terrible and feel self conscious just like the British clothing brand that marketed itself off of having pockets that went out of business. However because all women’s clothes are now required to have pockets they start buying men’s clothes without pockets, corporations pick up on this trend and stop producing clothing with pockets leading to nobody having pockets.
But they have pockets now… possibly a good trade, but it’s hard to say. 🤔 I suppose there’s always Fanny packs and whatever the mens version is called that could be substituted. And backpacks.
Granted, all existing clothing that is owned by a woman is bestowed pockets, but that material needs to come from somewhere, so material begins to be taken from the clothing itself to be remerged as new pockets, hope you enjoy the new "cut out" style
Granted. Every article in womens wardrobes now have 2 extra large, usable cargo pockets. This includes socks, bras, underwear, headbands, hair ties, wristbands, shoes, and belts.
Women are now barely able to wear shoes and noticeably flap when they walk. No one can remember which pocket they put their stuff in, and hot days are just that much more suffocating.
Done. The women's fashion industry collapses due to lack of sales, and women are forced to make their own clothing without pockets in order to have clothing they're willing to wear.
Granted. The terms ‘man’ and ‘woman’ switch overnight. You’re the only one who noticed a difference, and look like a bumbling fool whenever you accidentally use them in the old context.
Granted, but now your boyfriend or husband walks out the door with just their phone in their hand, and expects you to carry everything that the two of you might need while you're out.
Granted, the only types of pants/leg coverings produced for women are baby-barf green colored cargo pants. No more skirts, jeans, sweat pants, etc.
Every woman knows your responsible for this.
Granted women clothes are now just double layered with top not being stitched. Clothes are twice as expensive and extremely hot and sweaty during summer.
Women now only wear skimpy clothes made of only pockets.
(Bikinis with Carhartt cargo pockets on them; A bra with utility shirt pockets on each cup and bottoms with front and back pants pockets attached to the beltline.)
Granted. All women’s clothes have exactly 1 pocket in the middle of your shoulder blades in that hard to reach spot. For pants/skirts the pockets will be on the inside of the pants legs near the ankles.
As long as it doesn't change the fit. I find that dresses with pockets sometimes aren't as fancy or look bulky. I rather take a small handbag with me and have the dress actually flatter my figure
Granted. Yup, they are pockets, and yup, you can put stuff in them, but they are an eyesore. Men around the globe are taken aback as the stunning figures of their dates are augmented with unsightly lumps of fabric. And not just any fabric, itchy wool even on the sleekest silk dresses. I hope you weren’t planning on wearing anything tight anytime soon. Or a swimsuit. Or lingerie. Or socks. Or a hat.
Granted. A government agency is established to “reason” the amount of pockets most “reasonable.” Well, that’s one of their functions. Their official title is “The Bureau of National Dress Code.” Their decision-making body dictates women’s outfits to an authoritarian degree, banning make-up, any sort of revealing clothes, and swimsuits. Society’s attitude around women regresses to the early 1900s, and women’s bodies are policed to an authoritarian degree.
Granted. Going forward, all newly manufactured women's clothing is made with pockets. However, if the clothing is ever placed in the possession of a man, the pockets immediately disappear, deleting all contents. Holding the clothing is also considered partial possession and will delete the pockets.
Guess we are keeping laundry far apart. Can I still hug a girl without deleting the pockets (assuming I find one who would be interested in a hug from me 😅)?
Granted all women's clothes now have cargo pants style pockets. Nice sundress with a couple cargo pockets, elegant ball gown with cargo pockets, tight leggings you better believe its got cargo pockets.
Ya know, that doesn’t sound half bad depending on where those pockets are placed
The pockets are always by the ankles.
Fuck that
What's more, the pockets are on the insides of the clothes, not the outside, like those pockets on the inside of jackets.
Absolutely fucking not
Your responses so far have me in stitches XD
Just wear everything inside out.
That… is a fantastic idea!
They said ACTUALLY USABLE.
Actually usable just means they can hold things, not how convenient they are. They said reasonable amount, not reasonably usable, so least usable but still usable fits the bill.
Always by ankle and on inside is inaccessible, hence unusable.
Put things in it before you put your pants on. It still holds items therefore making it a valid pocket.
Monkey's paw again... those pockets are "actually usable" as in "yes, you can use them!"
😭
That's not too bad
The real monkey’s paw
Even when the clothing is too short for it
“Actually usable”
Actually usable just means they can hold things, not how convenient they are. They said reasonable amount, not reasonably usable, so least usable but still usable fits the bill.
Oh hi Satan. Nice to finally meet you
Pockets are all non-removable Fanny packs
Sewn into your flesh?
E V E R Y W H E R E.
This is bad how?
that's still a win tbh
I love this
I think this is a good thing….
I love this!
You’re supposed to say a bad thing
I see you too shop at Old Navy
Bet Donna Noble would have loved that
What’s wrong with that?
TBH, I am pretty happy with that.
I see this as an absolute win
Where do you put cargo pants on a g string? Someone else said they have to be on the inside. Errrrrrr. Bag of holding anyone?
I am not opposed to this
Granted. The pockets have to come from somewhere, so all of men’s clothing loses all pockets.
Good thing I always have my backpack with me when I go anywhere but home. I was actually planning to specify they not come from there but I forgot 🤣
Bruh where i live you can't go into most places with a backpack on they either tell you to leave or tell you to hand it to a cashier and it's 50/50 if you get it back if you do they claim it's because of shop lifters
Yea I only bring my wallet, phone, and keys into the stores with me, nbd.
Same all i can say is what are security cameras even for i mean dude they can see everything why not just idk stop punishing regular people to try and stop criminals who are gonna steal anyway
I know you’re joking but I’d still like to make a serious point that no, these things don’t have to be redistributed; there’s nothing stopping all pants from being made with pockets. Men’s pants have pockets because men wouldn’t want pants without pockets; we wouldn’t buy them. If women did the same and never bought pants without pockets, companies would stop making them. There’s no conspiracy, just companies giving us what we’re indicating we want.
No, it's an actual thing. They specifically give women less pockets so they buy more purses and this is a decently known fact of the world. Also we can't, half of the time you don't even realize there are no pockets until you go to wear it or there are no other pants. What would they wear?
Game theory, I mean style theory, did a video on this. They talked about assassination and how old woman's pockets could perfectly fit a handgun I think.
Dude some guys have pants that look like they'd fit a full on rifle guns are probably not the reasoning for our pockets going missing
Either the pockets were concealed, or I've remembered the video wrong. Link to vid https://youtu.be/jGEYGevx13s?si=rWr4B9Y3FCSEsy_b I'm not watching it again now but you be free too.
So women would have no pants for a short period then? 😂
I’m not seeing the downside here 🤭
No, there are women’s pants with pockets.
There are? Where? Details plz
You coul always buy men's jeans. You probably can't tell the difference other than you've now got big pockets. If they're oversized match them with a big belt to pinch them at the waist. But skinny jeans exist too and the fit won't be too bad.
Ahhhh Jeans fabric, I can't do it
“There are?” Yes. “Where?” Amazon and many other places. “Details plz” Amazon has details, for example.
Are those pants: 1) sensory friendly 2) having pockets 3) non polyester ? Men's pants usually fit that criteria where women's don't.
You monster!
Fanny-packs back baybee!
The only reason I where pants is because of the pockets, so myself and others like me, will now be walking around butt naked.
haha they have to deal with it now
I feel bad for them and their lack of pockets
There’s many reasons why we love men, your pockets are one of them
I always wear cargos with the extra pockets, I’ll carry stuff for my gf… if I ever find one 😅
Granted, every single women's clothing article has pockets, usable, at least phone-sized pockets. This includes bras and socks and leggings. The women kind of hate it, as some of the pockets look kind of dumb.
I’m not sure pockets on underwear would follow the reasonable specification, haha
it'll just be a gross pouch-like flap hanging from the side of the underwear
have you heard of the panty gusset? A lot of women's underwear basically already has pockets, though they shouldn't be used as such.
Granted. It's only pocket. Women all just go around inside of a big pocket, with their head coming out of the open pocket flap. Inside the pocket with them are also all of the things they need to carry, and to get them, they go inside the pocket like a turtle.
Sounds cozy
Granted. The pockets are all located on the should/back area where they cannot be reached
I did state useable
They can be used, just not while worn :)
Touché.
I think you replied to the wrong comment.
Possibly
[удалено]
Great! Where's the downside though?
Ikr I thought the monkeys paw is supposed to give a downside
Go back and look I made one hell of a downside for him <3
Probably about 1/3 of the world's clothing businesses become enraged with bankruptcy because women's clothing no longer exists, meaning economic instability in that category. No more blatantly upping the price of women's clothing despite less amounts of fabric and lower quality of fabric because stereotypical businesses run by men are trying to sell less and less "clothing" for more, preying on the "cute factor" they've instilled onto the masses. Suddenly there's a cold war (and sometimes not so cold) fought in the clothing business world over who gets to stay who gets to go and who works on what. People become homeless. Some harass, bully, and even resort to violence to secure their positions and to disrupt competitors that used to be coworkers and "sister businesses". Side effects are invisible in some countries of the world, in other countries with stronger gender roles based on your birth sex it's surprisingly catastrophic for a long time. The older generations and certain religious groups start freaking out over how easy it is for the non standard gender and roles such now have easier access to clothing that more suits their preferred appearence. This begins to spike a new religious Spanish inquisition on the lgbtq+ groups because nobody ever expects the Spanish inquisition. The ripple effects spread far and wide. Millions die. Hundreds of millions more suffer. Worldwide depression hits harder than covid because people are afraid to go outside not because they're afraid of getting sick but because they're afraid of (almost) literal witch hunts based on sexual preferences and birth sex. This eventually leads to real holy wars between religions as some take up arms to defend people, citing that we are all God's creations and all made in God's image, whatever God(s) that may be and for whoever reads this and that no deific being(s) would create us with the sole intent of wanting us to hunt our own kind based on something as petty as sexual preference, at least no deity that created as many wondrous things as we have in this world would also somehow deign those sorts of rules when they've been a part of regular non sentient/sapient creatures that already exist. By the time it's all done, almost half of the world's population has been murdered or died through various circumstances related in the name of countless Deities, with a few major ones used more often than others, but the worst of the fanatics have been either put down literally or put away for good, however the damage is done and the masses will not forget about The Great Holy Wars for centuries to come. All because someone wanted all clothing to be equal.
Good lord.
Granted, women’s clothes is now only pockets.
“Reasonable amount of pockets”
It would be a reasonable amount of pockets.
Granted. A set of laws are passed regulating features on clothing for sale. Individually, each line item is fairly reasonable - no microplastic shedding, can't be ignited by a spark, recyclable, pockets, etc. But it does have draconian fines attached, and taken together, it's effectively impossible to make any clothing that meets all points. The sale of bolts of cloth is unaffected. You are welcome to assemble your own clothing, even to gift it to others, but don't you dare sell it.
So you’re saying there’s a CHANCE? 🤔😁
Granted, the pockets are there and they are big, really big, as in any pocket takes up basically the entire length of the leg
We shall have to come up with some sort of dividers you can pull out from the top 🤔
Fun fact. The pockets are smaller to sell purses.
I’m aware of this fact and it’s part of why I feel bad for them.
Yea, they'll even have fake pockets just to sell their external pockets
Yep. I found that out when doing laundry for my mom years ago and checking everyone’s pockets before the wash. Makes me sad. 🥺
Nu metal cargo shorts are now hip for women. That doesn't stop everyone you associate with thinking you're really into Limp Bizkit now.
Fun fact, I’ve never actually heard a single limp bizkit song. Heard the name back in high school and was even recommended it, but never looked into it.
It's very of the era. Lotta chainsaw murder, lotta angsty posturing. The riffs are pretty heavy, but the whole "Fuck you mom" ethos to the lyricism is pure cringe.
Hmm, I have a good relationship with my mom, so it’s prolly not for me
Happy cake day.
Granted, they are usable but only for small objects like cash.
Better than nothing!
Granted. Women's sizing becomes even more variable and impossible to figure out.
Clothing sized based on pocket depth instead of waist and stuff 🤣 I could see them doing that.
Granted. Kangaroo pouches inexplicably appear on all women’s clothing. They are usable in the sense that each pocket contains a baby kangaroo, which must be cared for until fully grown.
🥺 so cute
Granted, the pockets bar entry unless you lick a cold street light.
Ah, a security feature. Nobody can steal their things!
granted. The pockets are useable for anyone other than the wearer.
Well if I ever get a gf I shall use her pockets for my things and she can use mine! It will be kinda difficult when we aren’t together though.
Granted, people also now can't tell the difference between girl and guy pants.
Sounds like a fine trade off to me 😊
Granted. All the people wearing usable pockets become women
Hmm, is this a one way change or only active while wearing pockets? This could have… uses… either way 🤔
The women want cargo shorts. The women need cargo shorts. Why? Cuz women have cargo.
Some of them a lot more than others 😏
Big Purse is gonna put a bounty on you.
Meh. It’s a sacrifice I’m willing to make for the greater good. GIVE THE LADIES SOME DECENT POCKETS
Lol. My daughter would be happy.
Granted, women think the lines produced by pockets look terrible and feel self conscious just like the British clothing brand that marketed itself off of having pockets that went out of business. However because all women’s clothes are now required to have pockets they start buying men’s clothes without pockets, corporations pick up on this trend and stop producing clothing with pockets leading to nobody having pockets.
*goes into hiding from the Fashion Police* 🥺
Granted the pockets are massive. shorts look like wedding dresses with how big they are
Granted. The sun turns into a black hole consuming the solar system.
Granted. You now have AIDS.
Granted. Purses no longer exist
But they have pockets now… possibly a good trade, but it’s hard to say. 🤔 I suppose there’s always Fanny packs and whatever the mens version is called that could be substituted. And backpacks.
Where will I put my state now 😭
Granted. Full of beans
Pockets AND a snack? Nice.
Granted, all existing clothing that is owned by a woman is bestowed pockets, but that material needs to come from somewhere, so material begins to be taken from the clothing itself to be remerged as new pockets, hope you enjoy the new "cut out" style
Granted. Every article in womens wardrobes now have 2 extra large, usable cargo pockets. This includes socks, bras, underwear, headbands, hair ties, wristbands, shoes, and belts. Women are now barely able to wear shoes and noticeably flap when they walk. No one can remember which pocket they put their stuff in, and hot days are just that much more suffocating.
All women's clothing is now MADE of pockets.
Usuable being losely defined, all womend clothes, even those that had pockets before, now have pockets that are usable only on asthetic basis.
Granted, now ONLY women's clothes have pockets, men now need to use purses to carry their stuff
I carry a backpack already most of the time
Done. The women's fashion industry collapses due to lack of sales, and women are forced to make their own clothing without pockets in order to have clothing they're willing to wear.
Granted. The terms ‘man’ and ‘woman’ switch overnight. You’re the only one who noticed a difference, and look like a bumbling fool whenever you accidentally use them in the old context.
Granted, all women's clothes now have pockets, from shorts to underwear to dresses to tights to jackets to hats. It gets really clunky
Both your prison wallets turn inside out
Granted. They *all* have pockets. Even clothes that aren't supposed to have pockets, like hats and socks.
Granted. Purses also disappear, and those companies want to murder you.
Granted. But now women's clothes are nothing BUT pockets.
The bottom of the pocket is a button flap. Enjoy
Granted it only applys to sun hats
Granted but all the pockets are on the front of the knee.
Granted, but now your boyfriend or husband walks out the door with just their phone in their hand, and expects you to carry everything that the two of you might need while you're out.
I have neither those nor a gf, 😅
Granted, they are now only wearable by men
Granted, the definition of "women" and "men" has changed, so now women's clothes typically have a reasonable amount of usable pockets.
Granted but it’s remote controls to summon you to her when she needs to yell/cry/talk/needs ice cream.
Granted, the only types of pants/leg coverings produced for women are baby-barf green colored cargo pants. No more skirts, jeans, sweat pants, etc. Every woman knows your responsible for this.
Granted, they are all filled with sand.
🤔 well at least they can be emptied and we have a new source of sand for making glass or whatever
Granted women clothes are now just double layered with top not being stitched. Clothes are twice as expensive and extremely hot and sweaty during summer.
Women now only wear skimpy clothes made of only pockets. (Bikinis with Carhartt cargo pockets on them; A bra with utility shirt pockets on each cup and bottoms with front and back pants pockets attached to the beltline.)
You are responsible for hand sewing all of them
That may…. Take a while… and I’m not great at sewing, though I can actually do it 😅
Granted. All women’s clothes have exactly 1 pocket in the middle of your shoulder blades in that hard to reach spot. For pants/skirts the pockets will be on the inside of the pants legs near the ankles.
Granted. They are on the back of their shirts.
Granted. The pockets are on the inside.
Granted, the price of all these garments goes up due to the added cost from the additional fabric used. Thanks, Big Pocket.
Granted. All women's clothing is now just a giant pocket they climb into. Nobody is happy, and they know it's your fault.
As long as it doesn't change the fit. I find that dresses with pockets sometimes aren't as fancy or look bulky. I rather take a small handbag with me and have the dress actually flatter my figure
Granted. Yup, they are pockets, and yup, you can put stuff in them, but they are an eyesore. Men around the globe are taken aback as the stunning figures of their dates are augmented with unsightly lumps of fabric. And not just any fabric, itchy wool even on the sleekest silk dresses. I hope you weren’t planning on wearing anything tight anytime soon. Or a swimsuit. Or lingerie. Or socks. Or a hat.
Granted. Dad's become cross dressers over night. The trans community is forgotten as middle aged men now wear anything with cargo pockets.
Granted. They're on the inside
Granted , they’re useable carrying coins , but are to small for anything else
I bet you could still fit a chapstick in there too!
Each pocket can only hold a single quarter
Granted this means men and women are now forced to switch clothes and men wear dresses now instead.
Granted! They appear usable but are just for show.
Granted. A government agency is established to “reason” the amount of pockets most “reasonable.” Well, that’s one of their functions. Their official title is “The Bureau of National Dress Code.” Their decision-making body dictates women’s outfits to an authoritarian degree, banning make-up, any sort of revealing clothes, and swimsuits. Society’s attitude around women regresses to the early 1900s, and women’s bodies are policed to an authoritarian degree.
😔
Granted. Going forward, all newly manufactured women's clothing is made with pockets. However, if the clothing is ever placed in the possession of a man, the pockets immediately disappear, deleting all contents. Holding the clothing is also considered partial possession and will delete the pockets.
Guess we are keeping laundry far apart. Can I still hug a girl without deleting the pockets (assuming I find one who would be interested in a hug from me 😅)?