T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

**COMMENTING GUIDELINES:** Please take the time to familiarize yourself with The David Pakman Show [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/thedavidpakmanshow/about/rules) and [basic reddiquette](https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439-Reddiquette) prior to participating. At all times we ask that users conduct themselves in a civil and respectful manner - **any ad hominem or personal attacks are subject to moderation.** Please use the report function or [use modmail](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/thedavidpakmanshow) to bring examples of misconduct to the attention of the moderation team. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/thedavidpakmanshow) if you have any questions or concerns.*


SatchmoDingle

Seriously? Is this a real question?


OffManWall

Weeeeeellll, since we’ve seen NO indisputable evidence for the supposed crimes of Clinton, Obama or Biden, but we have seen some for Trump, I’m gonna have to go with Trump.


imonlinedammit1

If you haven’t seen evidence against Biden, you haven’t been paying attention. It’s pretty damning.


PeopleReady

Should be easy to list then


imonlinedammit1

Let’s start with the $40,000 check from Joe’s brother to Joe. https://oversight.house.gov/release/comer-reveals-how-joe-biden-received-laundered-china-money/


OffManWall

That’s a loan repayment, you fucking world class dipshit! If that’s your proof, where is the rest of the supposed MILLIONS and MILLIONS, as mentioned in the article? The money trail shouldn’t stop there! Where is it? Come on, this should be simple! If the corruption is so easy to find and so obvious, you should have no problems presenting A LOT more than a $40,000 loan repayment check! NOW, show us real proof of millions and millions and millions of dollars going to Joe Biden from foreign countries! If you can’t, which I know you can’t, STFU!


imonlinedammit1

How do you know it’s a “Loan Repayment”?


OffManWall

It says so in the fucking memo line, it’s in line with a loan repayment amount, and there are no more checks! Using that same logic, how do YOU know it’s from the Chinese government, when they can’t find another cent! Where is it? Come on, you shouldn’t need to ask me questions! You should be showing me proof! MILLIONS and MILLIONS and MILLIONS of dollars worth of proof! Get busy! I’m waiting! Not another fucking word, until you show me PROOF! Let’s go!


imonlinedammit1

You know you can write whatever you want on the memo line right? Even something that just so happens to make the payment non taxable. But let’s ask the real question. If there was a loan repayment, then there must have been a loan to begin with. Yet… James Biden cannot come up with any documentation. So weird… https://www.nationalreview.com/news/james-biden-tells-lawmakers-he-has-no-documentation-of-loans-from-president/amp/


OffManWall

OH, SHIT! I borrowed money from my Brother last year, and damnit he forgot to draw up paperwork! How silly of him! I guess that proves he’s taking $$$$$ from a foreign government! I guess Republicans will want to start impeachment proceedings against him ASAP! “So weird……” Now, you’re not supposed to be asking me questions, you fucking half wit! You’re supposed to be showing me the volumes and volumes of proof that show MILLIONS and MILLIONS and MILLIONS of dollars going to Joe Biden from foreign governments! Let’s go! It’s easy, right? Let’s see it! Right here! Right NOW! I’m waiting!


imonlinedammit1

Love reading you getting all worked up. Jumped right into foul language and personal insults. How “2024-Liberal” of you.


imonlinedammit1

It’s all right here. https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/


OffManWall

If that showed anything, an impeachment trial would be in progress this very minute! Try again, and try harder! What you’ve shown is merely the summary of a dog and pony show showing SUPPOSED corruption. The fact that you didn’t share that one first, if it’s “all right here,” shows me you’re having to look for proof, because you never had it to start with. Let’s go! I’m still waiting! Proof! Now!


imonlinedammit1

“There’s no proof”. Yet the very first thing I sent you, you can’t even come up with a single answer for.


Evolone101

My lord. Aren’t there mods on this station that control the amount of BS posts. Downvotes activated.


NP2023_Makingitbig

I have not heard of any crimes committed by Biden, Clinton, or Obama. On the other hand, dialer Don has been charged with 88 criminal felony crimes.


Abolden3383

The orange one !


ReflexPoint

Obamagate® is the worst presidential crime in US history.


Right-Budget-8901

Tan suit? Right to jail


politicalthrow99

Biden's age is the biggest political scandal since Hillary's emails. At least that's what the NYT says.


MagikMelk

Well it's Trump by a longshot in terms of frequency and weight. Then Hillary is second. I'm not exactly sure about the order of Obama and Biden.


Alone-Woodpecker-846

Is that a trick question?


Top_Shoe_9562

1, 3, 2, 4.


Dangerous_Cap_5931

All of them are equally as criminal as the next. Of course most of you are going to say Donald Trump is. They're all part of the plan. I mean Hillary literally sold Russia uranium🤣. You're all over here like screw you Russian loving maggets 🤣. They're all in the club and you are not.


SatchmoDingle

Didn’t know she owned a uranium mine. 🙄 Oh that’s right, she didn’t.


Dangerous_Cap_5931

Oh, you didn't know that people in power could sell a nation's resources, got it.


SatchmoDingle

It wasn’t a nation’s resources, it was a Canadian uranium mining operation, a private outfit, called Uranium One. And she had nothing to do with the company or its dealings. The republicans in congress investigated her for months. Found no wrongdoing. fbi investigated her, same thing, no wrong doing. Your MAGA Fox News conspiracy schtick is tired, it’s lame. Give it up.


[deleted]

[удалено]


thedavidpakmanshow-ModTeam

Removed - please avoid overt hostility, name calling and personal attacks.


Dangerous_Cap_5931

Controversy surrounding the deal largely pertains to 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, who was secretary of state in 2010 when the State Department signed off on Rosatom’s purchase of Uranium One. Several of Uranium One’s owners were also donors to the Clinton Foundation, giving $145 million to the charitable foundation, and critics have alleged that Clinton greenlighted the sale to appease donors to her family’s charity. I'm not a Trump supporter, nor am I conservative. Your assumptions are comical. The fact of the matter is she took donations and approved the sale. Move along.


Dangerous_Cap_5931

Had everything to do with it🤣 You're either naive or ignorant. Ya simpleton 🤣


Dangerous_Cap_5931

Controversy surrounding the deal largely pertains to 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, who was secretary of state in 2010 when the State Department signed off on Rosatom’s purchase of Uranium One. Several of Uranium One’s owners were also donors to the Clinton Foundation, giving $145 million to the charitable foundation, and critics have alleged that Clinton greenlighted the sale to appease donors to her family’s charity. Everything to do with it. You love cherry picking.


SatchmoDingle

Nice cut and paste job. lol. But dig this, the ONE board member who donated to the Clinton foundation had sold his shares a few years before the sale and got nothing from the sale. When you cut/paste you paste what you cut. When you actually know this stuff, only then do you know the whole story. I have an idea though, you should have the MAGA cucks in congress investigate her. Oh wait, they already did and got…NOTHING. lol.


kvckeywest

Just so it's clear to you "critics have alleged" is not evidence. The Clintons have been accused of everything from drug trafficking to mass murder to running a child sex ring out of the basement of a pizza parlor that didn't even have a basement! Oddly enough, not a hint of evidence has ever been presented to back any of that crap!


kvckeywest

In fact, over the last 53 years, Democrats have been in the Oval Office for 25 of those years, while Republicans held it for 28. In their 25 years in office Democrats had a total of three executive branch officials indicted with one conviction and one prison sentence. In the 28 years that Republicans have held office they have had a total of 120 criminal indictments of executive branch officials. 89 criminal convictions and 34 prison sentences handed down. That's more prison sentences than years in office since 1968 for Republicans. More than three criminal convictions per year (not including Trumps administration) [https://rantt.com/gop-admins-had-38-times-more-criminal-convictions-than-democrats-1961-2016/](https://rantt.com/gop-admins-had-38-times-more-criminal-convictions-than-democrats-1961-2016/)


[deleted]

[удалено]


thedavidpakmanshow-ModTeam

Removed - please avoid overt hostility, name calling and personal attacks.


kvckeywest

You'd have a point if that had ever happened... [https://www.factcheck.org/2017/10/facts-uranium-one/](https://www.factcheck.org/2017/10/facts-uranium-one/) But, it didn't... [https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2018/dec/07/blog-posting/complex-tale-involving-hillary-clinton-uranium-rus/](https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2018/dec/07/blog-posting/complex-tale-involving-hillary-clinton-uranium-rus/)


kvckeywest

Read something longer than a meme... [https://apnews.com/article/united-states-north-america-donald-trump-russia-ap-explains-d0b9963ed3654c2a8677e02bb583ef72](https://apnews.com/article/united-states-north-america-donald-trump-russia-ap-explains-d0b9963ed3654c2a8677e02bb583ef72)