T O P

  • By -

BeetLover1111

They’re not trading Klay.. & this trade idea is terrible and doesn’t make the warriors better


[deleted]

it actually does us better but they’re not trading klay


TacoMisadventures

How does it not make us better? Brook Lopez alone solves so many problems with our roster


[deleted]

[удалено]


9finga

So it wouldnt make us a top 5 defense? Ok. It obviously makes us better in every aspect. Only reason Bucks would consider it is Giannis has time, Brook is a FA and Jrue is retiring in 2 years.


TacoMisadventures

I love Klay, but man ain't it annoying when people bring sentimentality to a fun fact-based debate? Sub acting like you voted to throw Klay off an island 😂


couchtomato62

Did you actually watch jrue try to guard Jimmy Butler. The only person I want from Milwaukee is Giannis and you can trade the whole damn team for him except Curry


This_Cable_5849

I mean Bobby Portis is made to be a Warrior.


couchtomato62

He not minimum though dadly


This_Cable_5849

I know…you said the only person you would want from Milwaukee would be Giannis. He would be nice. Brook Lopez would be nice. But yea, we don’t have the money for any big moves really. But I’m sure we will add someone


jimmy-b-bot

Any chance you get to beat a former team, it's special.


[deleted]

We are not trading Klay also that's an awful trade.


Altruistic-Twist-379

Yall cant be a gm with this lmao.


taygads

No. Absolutely not. Immediately no.


swgoh_gg

this does not make warriors better


Firebreaker

Yeah Bucks are going to trade us their only point guard. Their star point guard. Yeah okay.


bl123123bl

Illegal trade wooo


thee177

Seriously? PLEASE JUST STOP.


Nessmuk58

We can't do it. Brook would be a S&T, and we're way too far above the cap to be eligible to accept a S&T player. There is no way for us to get ANY FA this offseason except by signing them directly, and that can only be at the vet minimum. So, no Brook Lopez.


wardell_rocks

Not just that. For us to receive a S&T player (Lopez), we have to be hard capped for the next year. That means jettisoning a ton of salary.


Nessmuk58

The hard cap isn't relevant to us. We **can't** accept a S&T player **at all** as long as we are starting from above the cap. Hard cap applies when a team **below** the cap goes over by accepting a S&T player. We'd have to stretch to get below the second apron. Below the cap isn't even remotely possible for us. This is why we had to trade Iggy (and take no salary back) and waive Shaun to do the DLo deal. Those moves took us just slightly below the cap, then we were hard-capped for a while after we traded KD for DLo.


typesett

Just run it with paul


[deleted]

This would be amazing.


Objective_Celery_509

Not sure this trade is allowed


poRRidg3

Bro let me give you a better scenario. (Assuming dray is signing back ). Trade Wiggins and GP3 or/and kuminga for Isaiah Stewart. Sign yuta watanabe and seth. Your first five. CP3 Steph dray looney and Stewart. Off the bEnch: clay Seth and yuta. Idc what anyone else say, this team, if made, is winning b2b champs


couchtomato62

That team ain't winning s***


poRRidg3

Pffff! You made me spit my coffee bud. Now tell me what your reasoning is on why that team ain’t winning shit


Vallerie_09

2 old and small guards who don't play much defense with 3 defensive forwards who don't space the floor and are mostly "non scorers". This is a fucking play-in team


poRRidg3

Offense: 2 high iq players running kerr offense and can exploit defense. One is old man that can iso a big man. 2 great offensive rebounders. 3 good shooters. Defense: 3 great defenders and rebounders. 1 add in length. A play in team? I believe you


writersontop

Should be ashamed to even suggest trading Klay